ZEO vs. NLR
ZEO (Zeo Energy Corp) is a stock, while NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) is Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Over the past 3 years, ZEO returned -59.74%/yr vs 30.47%/yr for NLR. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZEO vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZEO achieves a -34.94% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's -3.82% return.
ZEO
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -16.58%
- YTD
- -34.94%
- 6M
- -27.45%
- 1Y
- -75.20%
- 3Y*
- -59.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- -3.82%
- 6M
- -7.14%
- 1Y
- 10.28%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
ZEO vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEO Zeo Energy Corp | -34.94% | -68.22% | -69.54% | 8.90% | 4.23% | 0.71% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -3.82% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEO and NLR is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEO vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
ZEO
NLR
ZEO vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zeo Energy Corp (ZEO) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZEO | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.07 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 0.35 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 0.74 | -1.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZEO vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEO drawdown since its inception was -95.24%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEO and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEO | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.24% | -65.05% | -30.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.76% | -29.72% | -53.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.24% | -30.48% | -64.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.84% | -27.33% | -66.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.02% | -35.68% | -6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.83% | 13.94% | +46.89% |
Volatility
ZEO vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
Zeo Energy Corp (ZEO) has a higher volatility of 23.70% compared to VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) at 13.71%. This indicates that ZEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEO | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.70% | 13.71% | +9.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 74.36% | 32.79% | +41.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.87% | 42.87% | +61.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 128.83% | 29.65% | +99.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 128.83% | 24.27% | +104.56% |
Dividends
ZEO vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
ZEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.65% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
ZEO Zeo Energy Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZEO and NLR have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZEO has higher volatility (23.70%) compared to NLR (13.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZEO dropped -95.24% vs NLR's -65.05%.
NLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZEO and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer