ZECP vs. SMIZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZECP (Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF) and SMIZ (Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZECP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Zacks, while SMIZ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Zacks. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZECP returned 20.73% vs 30.97% for SMIZ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZECP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for SMIZ.

Performance

ZECP vs. SMIZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZECP achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than SMIZ's 15.79% return.

ZECP

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 6.36%
• 6M: 5.67%
• 1Y: 20.73%
• 3Y*: 15.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMIZ

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 3.15%
• YTD: 15.79%
• 6M: 14.09%
• 1Y: 30.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZECP vs. SMIZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	6.36%	15.03%	17.32%	10.88%
SMIZ Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF	15.79%	12.16%	17.92%	16.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ZECP and SMIZ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2023	0.78

The correlation between ZECP and SMIZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZECP vs. SMIZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZECP	SMIZ
Technology	25.3%	24.7%
Financial Services	16.1%	21.0%
Industrials	14.8%	21.6%
Healthcare	13.3%	8.1%
Communication Services	10.7%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	6.1%
Utilities	3.9%	2.6%
Energy	1.0%	2.9%
Real Estate	0.7%	3.5%
Basic Materials	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

ZECP vs. SMIZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZECP

ZECP Risk / Return Rank: 59
ZECP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ZECP Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
ZECP Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ZECP Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ZECP Martin Ratio Rank: 64

SMIZ

SMIZ Risk / Return Rank: 58
SMIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SMIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SMIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SMIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SMIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZECP vs. SMIZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZECP	SMIZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.86	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.63	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.33	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	2.96	-0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.46	11.82	-0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZECP vs. SMIZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZECP Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the SMIZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZECP and SMIZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZECP	SMIZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	1.86	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	1.29	-0.66

Drawdowns

ZECP vs. SMIZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZECP drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum SMIZ drawdown of -25.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZECP and SMIZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZECP	SMIZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-25.04%	+3.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.32%	-10.51%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.83%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-3.97%	-1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	2.63%	-0.82%

Volatility

ZECP vs. SMIZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) is 2.14%, while Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that ZECP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMIZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZECP	SMIZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.14%	4.59%	-2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.08%	12.79%	-4.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.51%	16.76%	-6.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.65%	18.89%	-4.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.65%	18.89%	-4.24%

ZECP vs. SMIZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZECP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIZ's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZECP vs. SMIZ - Dividend Comparison

ZECP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than SMIZ's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SMIZ Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF	0.53%	0.62%	1.57%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	0.74%	0.79%	0.63%	0.73%	0.91%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZECP and SMIZ in my portfolio?

ZECP and SMIZ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZECP or SMIZ?

SMIZ has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to ZECP (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZECP dropped -21.86% vs SMIZ's -25.04%.

Which ETF is better, ZECP or SMIZ?

On 1-year performance, SMIZ leads with 30.97% vs 20.73% for ZECP. On fees, ZECP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ZECP has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZECP or SMIZ?

Over the 1-year period, SMIZ has performed better with a 30.97% return vs 20.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZECP or SMIZ?

ZECP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for SMIZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZECP or SMIZ?

ZECP has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.53% for SMIZ.

What is the main difference between ZECP and SMIZ?

ZECP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SMIZ is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZECP and 0.56% for SMIZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZECP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.