ZECP vs. CNAV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ZECP (Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZECP returned 18.64% vs 39.18% for CNAV. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ZECP charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

ZECP vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZECP achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 24.51% return.

ZECP

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 6.82%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 1Y: 18.64%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.36%

CNAV

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -10.01%
• 6M: 18.26%
• YTD: 24.51%
• 1Y: 39.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	$249.12K	$293.43K	$339.76K
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	$1.64M	$1.62M	$1.64M

ZECP vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	8.60%	15.03%	-0.63%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	24.51%	16.80%	6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ZECP and CNAV is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.59

The correlation between ZECP and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZECP vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZECP

ZECP Risk / Return Rank: 71
ZECP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ZECP Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ZECP Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ZECP Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ZECP Martin Ratio Rank: 76

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 44
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZECP vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZECP	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.06	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.53	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.20	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	1.40	+0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.58	6.25	+3.33

ZECP vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZECP Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZECP and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZECP vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZECP drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZECP and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZECP	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-30.06%	+8.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.32%	-25.80%	+17.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-20.15%	+19.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.35%	-5.84%	+0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	5.79%	-3.94%

Volatility

ZECP vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) is 2.82%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 15.97%. This indicates that ZECP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZECP	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	15.97%	-13.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.49%	31.59%	-23.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.85%	34.30%	-23.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.53%	31.45%	-16.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.53%	31.45%	-16.92%

ZECP vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZECP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZECP vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

ZECP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	0.73%	0.79%	0.63%	0.73%	0.91%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZECP and CNAV in my portfolio?

ZECP and CNAV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZECP or CNAV?

CNAV has higher volatility (15.97%) compared to ZECP (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZECP dropped -21.86% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, ZECP or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 39.18% vs 18.64% for ZECP. On fees, ZECP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ZECP has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZECP or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 39.18% return vs 18.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZECP or CNAV?

ZECP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZECP or CNAV?

ZECP has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between ZECP and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Zacks and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZECP and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZECP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.