ZDEK vs. OCTZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ZDEK (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December) and OCTZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZDEK returned 8.37% vs 17.42% for OCTZ. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

ZDEK vs. OCTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZDEK achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than OCTZ's 6.06% return.

ZDEK

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 2.36%
• 6M: 2.29%
• 1Y: 8.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OCTZ

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 6.06%
• 6M: 5.44%
• 1Y: 17.42%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZDEK vs. OCTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZDEK Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December	2.36%	7.78%	-0.33%
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF	6.06%	12.89%	-2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ZDEK and OCTZ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2024	0.88

The correlation between ZDEK and OCTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZDEK vs. OCTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZDEK

ZDEK Risk / Return Rank: 94
ZDEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ZDEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
ZDEK Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ZDEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ZDEK Martin Ratio Rank: 95

OCTZ

OCTZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
OCTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
OCTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
OCTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OCTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
OCTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZDEK vs. OCTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZDEK	OCTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.13	1.76	+1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.84	2.42	+2.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.31	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.58	2.39	+3.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.40	9.81	+18.59

ZDEK vs. OCTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZDEK Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the OCTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZDEK and OCTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZDEK vs. OCTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZDEK drawdown since its inception was -3.40%, smaller than the maximum OCTZ drawdown of -15.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDEK and OCTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZDEK	OCTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-15.82%	+12.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.51%	-7.31%	+5.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-2.48%	+2.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-3.14%	+2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	1.78%	-1.48%

Volatility

ZDEK vs. OCTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK) is 0.70%, while TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that ZDEK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OCTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZDEK	OCTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.70%	3.96%	-3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.73%	8.04%	-6.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70%	9.99%	-7.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.30%	12.49%	-9.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.30%	12.41%	-9.11%

ZDEK vs. OCTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZDEK and OCTZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

ZDEK vs. OCTZ - Dividend Comparison

ZDEK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OCTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF	3.76%	3.99%	1.26%	3.28%	0.67%
ZDEK Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZDEK and OCTZ in my portfolio?

ZDEK and OCTZ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZDEK or OCTZ?

OCTZ has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to ZDEK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZDEK dropped -3.40% vs OCTZ's -15.82%.

Which ETF is better, ZDEK or OCTZ?

On 1-year performance, OCTZ leads with 17.42% vs 8.37% for ZDEK. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ZDEK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZDEK or OCTZ?

Over the 1-year period, OCTZ has performed better with a 17.42% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZDEK or OCTZ?

ZDEK and OCTZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZDEK or OCTZ?

OCTZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.00% for ZDEK.

What is the main difference between ZDEK and OCTZ?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and TrueShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZDEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.