PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZDEK vs. MAXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZDEK vs. MAXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZDEK achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly lower than MAXJ's 2.88% return.


ZDEK

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.84%
YTD
2.56%
6M
2.82%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAXJ

1D
0.03%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.88%
6M
3.34%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZDEK vs. MAXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZDEK and MAXJ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024

0.78

The correlation between ZDEK and MAXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZDEK vs. MAXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZDEK
ZDEK Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ZDEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDEK Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MAXJ
MAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZDEK vs. MAXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZDEKMAXJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.28

3.19

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.12

5.25

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.76

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.02

5.45

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.78

30.88

-0.10

ZDEK vs. MAXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZDEK Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is comparable to the MAXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZDEK and MAXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZDEKMAXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28

3.19

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.02

1.64

+0.38

Drawdowns

ZDEK vs. MAXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZDEK drawdown since its inception was -3.40%, smaller than the maximum MAXJ drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDEK and MAXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZDEKMAXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.40%

-6.35%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.51%

-1.70%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-0.56%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

0.30%

-0.01%

Volatility

ZDEK vs. MAXJ - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK) has a higher volatility of 0.36% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) at 0.30%. This indicates that ZDEK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZDEKMAXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

0.30%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.64%

1.93%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77%

2.93%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.31%

5.28%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.31%

5.28%

-1.97%

ZDEK vs. MAXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZDEK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MAXJ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZDEK vs. MAXJ - Dividend Comparison

ZDEK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZDEK and MAXJ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZDEK has higher volatility (0.36%) compared to MAXJ (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZDEK dropped -3.40% vs MAXJ's -6.35%.

On 1-year performance, MAXJ leads with 9.25% vs 9.03% for ZDEK. On fees, MAXJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAXJ has performed better with a 9.25% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAXJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZDEK.

MAXJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for ZDEK.

ZDEK is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MAXJ is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZDEK and 0.50% for MAXJ.

ZDEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZDEK and MAXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer