PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCSH vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCSH vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZCSH achieves a -12.85% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -44.11% return.


ZCSH

1D
-6.64%
1M
-41.90%
YTD
-12.85%
6M
-2.07%
1Y
725.30%
3Y*
137.71%
5Y*
10Y*

FETH

1D
-4.17%
1M
-19.46%
YTD
-44.11%
6M
-44.07%
1Y
-28.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCSH vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
-12.85%446.78%8.49%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-44.11%-11.37%-4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCSH and FETH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.51

The correlation between ZCSH and FETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCSH vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCSH vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZCSHFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.98

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.52

-0.42

+10.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.90

-0.70

+20.61

ZCSH vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZCSH Sharpe Ratio is 4.20, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZCSH and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZCSH vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCSH drawdown since its inception was -93.73%, which is greater than FETH's maximum drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCSH and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCSHFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.73%

-67.57%

-26.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

-67.57%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.02%

-65.81%

+17.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.01%

-33.69%

-40.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.72%

40.48%

-3.76%

Volatility

ZCSH vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a higher volatility of 64.75% compared to Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) at 19.78%. This indicates that ZCSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCSHFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

64.75%

19.78%

+44.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

107.29%

46.89%

+60.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

174.37%

69.15%

+105.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

138.34%

72.38%

+65.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

138.34%

72.38%

+65.96%

ZCSH vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCSH vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZCSH nor FETH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCSH and FETH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZCSH has higher volatility (64.75%) compared to FETH (19.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZCSH dropped -93.73% vs FETH's -67.57%.

On 1-year performance, ZCSH leads with 725.30% vs -28.45% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FETH has been the lower-risk option at 19.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZCSH has performed better with a 725.30% return vs -28.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

ZCSH and FETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC), while FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.25% for FETH.

ZCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCSH and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer