ZCSH vs. CBXO
ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - ZCSH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Zcash (ZEC), while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. ZCSH is passively managed, while CBXO is actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZCSH charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
ZCSH vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCSH achieves a 41.32% return, which is significantly higher than CBXO's -3.67% return.
ZCSH
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 47.90%
- YTD
- 41.32%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- 1,002.48%
- 3Y*
- 185.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -3.67%
- 6M
- -5.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 41.32% | 197.45% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.67% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCSH and CBXO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCSH vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
ZCSH
CBXO
ZCSH vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZCSH | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.49 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCSH | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | -2.36 | +2.45 |
Drawdowns
ZCSH vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCSH drawdown since its inception was -93.73%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCSH and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCSH | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.73% | -11.40% | -82.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.71% | -11.40% | -4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.41% | -8.46% | -65.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.49% | — | — |
Volatility
ZCSH vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCSH | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 166.02% | 7.23% | +158.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.87% | 7.23% | +129.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.87% | 7.23% | +129.64% |
ZCSH vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZCSH vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCSH and CBXO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBXO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBXO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
CBXO has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.
ZCSH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for ZCSH and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer