CBXO vs. ETHD
CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) and ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while ETHD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.79, they often move in opposite directions. CBXO charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for ETHD.
Performance
CBXO vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBXO achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 61.66% return.
CBXO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- -3.74%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 27.31%
- YTD
- 61.66%
- 6M
- 62.24%
- 1Y
- -49.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.74% | -8.05% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 61.66% | 77.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBXO and ETHD is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | -0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBXO vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank
CBXO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETHD
CBXO vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBXO | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.03 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBXO vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBXO drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXO and ETHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBXO | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -95.59% | +84.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -83.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.49% | -87.37% | +75.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -66.37% | +57.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 66.84% | — |
Volatility
CBXO vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBXO | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 38.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 93.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.96% | 137.58% | -130.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 142.56% | -135.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 142.56% | -135.60% |
CBXO vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBXO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBXO vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison
CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than ETHD's 10.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 10.82% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBXO and ETHD have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBXO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBXO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 0.53% for CBXO.
CBXO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ETHD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXO and 1.01% for ETHD.
Find the right allocation for CBXO and ETHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer