PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCSH vs. BITC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCSH vs. BITC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZCSH achieves a 41.32% return, which is significantly higher than BITC's 6.98% return.


ZCSH

1D
-5.29%
1M
47.90%
YTD
41.32%
6M
72.54%
1Y
1,002.48%
3Y*
185.96%
5Y*
10Y*

BITC

1D
-0.00%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
6.98%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
-15.09%
3Y*
36.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCSH vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
41.32%446.78%96.92%27.51%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
6.98%-20.46%97.86%42.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCSH and BITC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCSH vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCSH vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZCSHBITCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.90

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.55

-0.57

+15.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.49

-0.82

+29.32

ZCSH vs. BITC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZCSH Sharpe Ratio is 6.10, which is higher than the BITC Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZCSH and BITC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCSHBITCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10

-0.59

+6.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.68

-0.58

Drawdowns

ZCSH vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCSH drawdown since its inception was -93.73%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCSH and BITC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCSHBITCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.73%

-38.51%

-55.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

-26.51%

-43.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.90%

-38.51%

-33.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.71%

-26.48%

+10.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.41%

-16.37%

-58.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.49%

18.37%

+17.12%

Volatility

ZCSH vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a higher volatility of 48.45% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 6.39%. This indicates that ZCSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCSHBITCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.45%

6.39%

+42.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.06%

19.98%

+74.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

166.02%

25.54%

+140.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

136.87%

46.65%

+90.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

136.87%

46.65%

+90.22%

ZCSH vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCSH vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison

ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.14%3.36%42.68%5.82%
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCSH and BITC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZCSH has higher volatility (48.45%) compared to BITC (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZCSH dropped -93.73% vs BITC's -38.51%.

On 3-year performance, ZCSH leads with 185.96% vs 36.02% for BITC. On fees, BITC is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, BITC has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ZCSH has performed better with a 185.96% return vs 36.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITC is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

BITC has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.88% for BITC.

ZCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.10 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCSH and BITC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer