PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCBC vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCBC vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF (ZCBC) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZCBC

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PAVE

1D
-1.61%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
18.60%
6M
17.73%
1Y
35.53%
3Y*
26.00%
5Y*
17.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBC vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZCBC and PAVE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCBC vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCBC

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCBC vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF (ZCBC) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZCBC vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCBCPAVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.68

-1.10

Drawdowns

ZCBC vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBC drawdown since its inception was -3.65%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBC and PAVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCBCPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-44.08%

+40.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-2.86%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-6.24%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

Volatility

ZCBC vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCBCPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.59%

18.88%

-14.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.59%

21.60%

-17.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

24.38%

-19.79%

ZCBC vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCBC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCBC vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

ZCBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than PAVE's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.77%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%
ZCBC
Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF
1.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCBC and PAVE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCBC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCBC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.

ZCBC has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.77% for PAVE.

ZCBC is categorized as Government Bonds, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. ZCBC tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2032 Maturity Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBC and 0.47% for PAVE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCBC and PAVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer