PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCBA vs. GGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCBA vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF (ZCBA) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZCBA

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GGOV

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
1.87%
6M
-1.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBA vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZCBA and GGOV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCBA vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF (ZCBA) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZCBA vs. GGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCBAGGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.58

-0.20

-0.38

Drawdowns

ZCBA vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBA drawdown since its inception was -2.39%, smaller than the maximum GGOV drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBA and GGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCBAGGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-4.69%

+2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-1.91%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-1.59%

+0.59%

Volatility

ZCBA vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCBAGGOVDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

5.37%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.23%

5.37%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.23%

5.37%

-2.14%

ZCBA vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCBA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCBA vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison

ZCBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZCBA and GGOV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCBA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCBA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.

ZCBA has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.

ZCBA is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBA and 0.39% for GGOV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCBA and GGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer