PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZALT vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZALT vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZALT achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than NVDY's 13.06% return.


ZALT

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.94%
YTD
3.61%
6M
3.99%
1Y
10.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDY

1D
-2.22%
1M
5.54%
YTD
13.06%
6M
17.67%
1Y
46.64%
3Y*
54.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZALT vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
3.61%9.44%11.92%3.95%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
13.06%27.38%114.23%8.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ZALT and NVDY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023

0.52

The correlation between ZALT and NVDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZALT vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZALT
ZALT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ZALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZALT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ZALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZALT vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZALTNVDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.29

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.08

3.66

+2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.69

9.00

+12.69

ZALT vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZALT Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZALT and NVDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZALTNVDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.72

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.73

1.64

+0.09

Drawdowns

ZALT vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZALT drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZALT and NVDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZALTNVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-34.08%

+25.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.71%

-12.81%

+11.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-6.66%

+6.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-6.15%

+5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

5.20%

-4.72%

Volatility

ZALT vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is 0.39%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that ZALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZALTNVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

9.46%

-9.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

20.68%

-17.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

27.35%

-23.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

38.24%

-31.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.38%

38.24%

-31.86%

ZALT vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZALT vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

ZALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.36%.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
61.36%83.10%83.65%22.32%
ZALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZALT and NVDY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDY has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to ZALT (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZALT dropped -8.19% vs NVDY's -34.08%.

On 1-year performance, NVDY leads with 46.64% vs 10.35% for ZALT. On fees, ZALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, ZALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 46.64% return vs 10.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDY.

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 61.36%, compared with 0.00% for ZALT.

ZALT is categorized as Options Trading, while NVDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ZALT and 0.99% for NVDY.

ZALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZALT and NVDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer