PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZALT vs. LOUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZALT vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZALT vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
0.15%9.44%11.92%3.95%
LOUP
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
-8.46%43.24%21.80%23.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZALT achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly higher than LOUP's -8.46% return.


ZALT

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
0.15%
6M
2.21%
1Y
9.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LOUP

1D
1.60%
1M
-6.70%
YTD
-8.46%
6M
-6.65%
1Y
51.63%
3Y*
25.42%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZALT vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZALT vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZALT
ZALT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ZALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZALT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ZALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZALT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

LOUP
LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZALT vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZALTLOUPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

1.48

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

2.08

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.57

-1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.86

8.80

+1.07

ZALT vs. LOUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the LOUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZALT and LOUP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZALTLOUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.48

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.57

0.44

+1.13

Correlation

The correlation between ZALT and LOUP is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZALT vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZALT nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ZALT vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZALT drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZALT and LOUP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZALTLOUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-58.68%

+50.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.43%

-21.00%

+14.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-15.41%

+14.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.50%

-20.41%

+19.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

6.14%

-5.17%

Volatility

ZALT vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is 1.39%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that ZALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZALTLOUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

10.95%

-9.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.60%

21.89%

-18.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.56%

35.05%

-26.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

32.18%

-25.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.55%

31.98%

-25.43%