YYYM vs. BATT
YYYM (Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YYYM is a High Yield Muni fund tracking the Nasdaq Municipal Bond CEF High Income Index, while BATT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify. YYYM is passively managed, while BATT is actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YYYM charges 2.78%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BATT.
Performance
YYYM vs. BATT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
YYYM
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BATT
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- -7.60%
- YTD
- 11.88%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 72.98%
- 3Y*
- 9.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- —
YYYM vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
YYYM Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF | 1.96% |
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between YYYM and BATT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YYYM vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank
YYYM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BATT
YYYM vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF (YYYM) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YYYM | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YYYM vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YYYM drawdown since its inception was -5.28%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YYYM and BATT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YYYM | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -69.38% | +64.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -47.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.36% | +14.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -34.59% | +33.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.28% | — |
Volatility
YYYM vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YYYM | BATT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 27.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.92% | 32.76% | -22.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.92% | 29.97% | -20.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.92% | 30.76% | -20.84% |
YYYM vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison
YYYM has a 2.78% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
YYYM vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison
YYYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than BATT's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.65% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% |
YYYM Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YYYM and BATT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BATT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BATT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 2.78% for YYYM.
BATT has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.19% for YYYM.
YYYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while BATT is Lithium & Battery Metals. Their fees differ too: 2.78% for YYYM and 0.59% for BATT.
Find the right allocation for YYYM and BATT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer