PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YUM vs. NSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

YUM vs. NSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) and Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUM achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than NSC's 9.68% return. Over the past 10 years, YUM has underperformed NSC with an annualized return of 12.08%, while NSC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.62% annualized return.


YUM

1D
0.68%
1M
3.54%
YTD
2.97%
6M
3.12%
1Y
9.24%
3Y*
6.33%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
12.08%

NSC

1D
1.09%
1M
1.07%
YTD
9.68%
6M
6.63%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
16.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YUM vs. NSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YUM
YUM! Brands, Inc.
2.97%14.94%4.72%3.93%-5.99%30.05%9.85%11.41%14.61%31.09%
NSC
Norfolk Southern Corporation
9.68%25.65%1.55%-1.63%-15.59%27.26%24.76%32.39%5.22%36.85%

Correlation

The correlation between YUM and NSC is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 1997

0.35

Fundamentals

EPS

YUM:

$6.21

NSC:

$15.83

PE Ratio

YUM:

24.84

NSC:

19.83

PEG Ratio

YUM:

11.21

NSC:

3.01

PS Ratio

YUM:

5.09

NSC:

4.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

YUM:

$8.49B

NSC:

$12.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

YUM:

$3.88B

NSC:

$6.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

YUM:

$2.83B

NSC:

$5.20B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YUM vs. NSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUM
YUM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
YUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
YUM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
YUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
YUM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

NSC
NSC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YUM vs. NSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) and Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YUMNSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.27

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

2.19

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.79

6.52

-4.74

YUM vs. NSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YUM Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the NSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUM and NSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YUM vs. NSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUM drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, roughly equal to the maximum NSC drawdown of -67.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUM and NSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YUMNSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-67.74%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-12.47%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.10%

-25.11%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.10%

-35.64%

+12.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.17%

-44.42%

-7.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.79%

-3.61%

-4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.37%

-15.13%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

4.17%

+1.02%

Volatility

YUM vs. NSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) is 5.67%, while Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that YUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YUMNSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

8.02%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.16%

15.97%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.96%

19.77%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.46%

25.05%

-4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.75%

27.53%

-4.78%

Dividends

YUM vs. NSC - Dividend Comparison

YUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than NSC's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NSC
Norfolk Southern Corporation
1.72%1.87%2.30%2.28%2.01%1.40%1.58%1.85%2.03%1.68%2.18%2.79%
YUM
YUM! Brands, Inc.
1.89%1.88%2.00%1.85%1.78%1.44%1.73%1.67%1.57%1.47%41.26%2.31%

Financials

YUM vs. NSC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between YUM! Brands, Inc. and Norfolk Southern Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.06B
3.00B
(YUM) Total Revenue
(NSC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

YUM vs. NSC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between YUM! Brands, Inc. and Norfolk Southern Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
44.7%
66.8%
Portfolio components
YUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 920.00M and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.7%.

NSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.

YUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 644.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

NSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported an operating income of 877.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

YUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.

NSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported a net income of 547.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YUM and NSC have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSC has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to YUM (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YUM dropped -67.69% vs NSC's -67.74%.

NSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YUM and NSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer