PortfoliosLab logo
NSC vs. UNP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NSC and UNP is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

NSC vs. UNP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NSC:

0.46

UNP:

-0.03

Sortino Ratio

NSC:

1.04

UNP:

0.15

Omega Ratio

NSC:

1.12

UNP:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

NSC:

0.59

UNP:

-0.02

Martin Ratio

NSC:

1.46

UNP:

-0.06

Ulcer Index

NSC:

10.24%

UNP:

7.49%

Daily Std Dev

NSC:

29.28%

UNP:

23.57%

Max Drawdown

NSC:

-67.74%

UNP:

-67.49%

Current Drawdown

NSC:

-9.88%

UNP:

-13.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NSC:

$55.91B

UNP:

$132.51B

EPS

NSC:

$14.66

UNP:

$11.09

PE Ratio

NSC:

16.92

UNP:

20.00

PEG Ratio

NSC:

2.30

UNP:

2.76

PS Ratio

NSC:

4.62

UNP:

5.47

PB Ratio

NSC:

3.81

UNP:

8.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

NSC:

$12.11B

UNP:

$24.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NSC:

$4.73B

UNP:

$11.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

NSC:

$6.47B

UNP:

$12.48B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSC achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly higher than UNP's -1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, NSC has outperformed UNP with an annualized return of 12.77%, while UNP has yielded a comparatively lower 10.50% annualized return.


NSC

YTD

6.88%

1M

10.53%

6M

-7.14%

1Y

13.32%

3Y*

2.81%

5Y*

7.51%

10Y*

12.77%

UNP

YTD

-1.62%

1M

2.21%

6M

-4.79%

1Y

-0.65%

3Y*

2.02%

5Y*

7.00%

10Y*

10.50%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Norfolk Southern Corporation

Union Pacific Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NSC vs. UNP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NSC is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NSC is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NSC is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NSC is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NSC is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NSC is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

UNP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UNP is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UNP is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UNP is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UNP is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UNP is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UNP is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NSC vs. UNP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the UNP Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSC and UNP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NSC vs. UNP - Dividend Comparison

NSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than UNP's 2.42% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NSC
Norfolk Southern Corporation
2.18%2.30%2.28%2.01%1.40%1.58%1.85%2.03%1.68%2.18%2.79%2.03%
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
2.42%2.32%2.12%2.45%1.70%1.86%2.05%2.21%1.85%2.17%2.81%1.60%

Drawdowns

NSC vs. UNP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSC drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, roughly equal to the maximum UNP drawdown of -67.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSC and UNP.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NSC vs. UNP - Volatility Comparison

Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) have volatilities of 8.22% and 7.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NSC vs. UNP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Norfolk Southern Corporation and Union Pacific Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
2.99B
6.03B
(NSC) Total Revenue
(UNP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NSC vs. UNP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Norfolk Southern Corporation and Union Pacific Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
41.8%
45.3%
(NSC) Gross Margin
(UNP) Gross Margin
NSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.25B and revenue of 2.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.8%.

UNP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Union Pacific Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.73B and revenue of 6.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.3%.

NSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.3%.

UNP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Union Pacific Corporation reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.3%.

NSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported a net income of 750.00M and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.

UNP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Union Pacific Corporation reported a net income of 1.63B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in a net margin of 27.0%.