YUM vs. YUMC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

YUM (YUM! Brands, Inc.) and YUMC (Yum China Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 5 years, YUM returned 7.31%/yr vs -8.03%/yr for YUMC. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

YUM vs. YUMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUM achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than YUMC's -13.15% return.

YUM

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: -0.96%
• 1Y: 9.28%
• 3Y*: 5.81%
• 5Y*: 7.31%
• 10Y*: 11.92%

YUMC

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -7.47%
• YTD: -13.15%
• 6M: -14.53%
• 1Y: -4.70%
• 3Y*: -8.40%
• 5Y*: -8.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YUM vs. YUMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YUM YUM! Brands, Inc.	1.17%	14.94%	4.72%	3.93%	-5.99%	30.05%	9.85%	11.41%	14.61%	31.09%
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	-13.15%	1.18%	15.41%	-21.60%	10.75%	-11.99%	19.48%	44.85%	-15.28%	53.59%

Correlation

The correlation between YUM and YUMC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2016	0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap YUM : $42.30B YUMC : $14.46B
EPS YUM : $6.21 YUMC : $2.60
PE Ratio YUM : 24.40 YUMC : 15.73
PEG Ratio YUM : 11.01 YUMC : 1.05
PS Ratio YUM : 5.00 YUMC : 1.23
Total Revenue (TTM) YUM : $8.49B YUMC : $12.09B
Gross Profit (TTM) YUM : $3.88B YUMC : $1.47B
EBITDA (TTM) YUM : $2.83B YUMC : $1.71B

Return for Risk

YUM vs. YUMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUM

YUM Risk / Return Rank: 55
YUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
YUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
YUM Omega Ratio Rank: 48
YUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
YUM Martin Ratio Rank: 60

YUMC

YUMC Risk / Return Rank: 34
YUMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
YUMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
YUMC Omega Ratio Rank: 30
YUMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
YUMC Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YUM vs. YUMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YUM	YUMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	-0.19	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	-0.09	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.99	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	-0.17	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.75	-0.41	+2.16

YUM vs. YUMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YUM Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the YUMC Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUM and YUMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YUM vs. YUMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUM drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than YUMC's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUM and YUMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	YUM	YUMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.69%	-56.49%	-11.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	-28.46%	+16.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.70%	-51.42%	+35.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.10%	-54.65%	+31.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.41%	-36.50%	+27.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.37%	-19.52%	+7.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.33%	11.45%	-6.12%

Volatility

YUM vs. YUMC - Volatility Comparison

YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) have volatilities of 6.39% and 6.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YUM	YUMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.39%	6.51%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.84%	19.11%	-4.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.10%	25.58%	-3.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.48%	37.27%	-16.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.73%	35.67%	-12.94%

Dividends

YUM vs. YUMC - Dividend Comparison

YUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than YUMC's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
YUM YUM! Brands, Inc.	1.93%	1.88%	2.00%	1.85%	1.78%	1.44%	1.73%	1.67%	1.57%	1.47%	41.26%	2.31%
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	2.59%	2.01%	1.33%	1.23%	0.88%	0.96%	0.42%	1.00%	1.25%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

YUM vs. YUMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between YUM! Brands, Inc. and Yum China Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

YUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 920.00M and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.7%.

YUMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

YUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 644.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

YUMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 447.00M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

YUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.

YUMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YUM and YUMC in my portfolio?

YUM and YUMC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YUM or YUMC?

YUMC has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to YUM (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YUM dropped -67.69% vs YUMC's -56.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.