PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
YUM vs. YUMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between YUM and YUMC is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

YUM vs. YUMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.07%
49.55%
YUM
YUMC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

YUM:

0.77

YUMC:

0.65

Sortino Ratio

YUM:

1.35

YUMC:

1.30

Omega Ratio

YUM:

1.16

YUMC:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

YUM:

1.18

YUMC:

0.46

Martin Ratio

YUM:

2.73

YUMC:

1.60

Ulcer Index

YUM:

5.48%

YUMC:

16.12%

Daily Std Dev

YUM:

19.32%

YUMC:

39.64%

Max Drawdown

YUM:

-67.69%

YUMC:

-56.49%

Current Drawdown

YUM:

-0.56%

YUMC:

-26.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

YUM:

$41.51B

YUMC:

$18.51B

EPS

YUM:

$5.19

YUMC:

$2.37

PE Ratio

YUM:

28.50

YUMC:

20.74

PEG Ratio

YUM:

2.71

YUMC:

1.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

YUM:

$5.19B

YUMC:

$11.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

YUM:

$2.54B

YUMC:

$4.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

YUM:

$1.93B

YUMC:

$1.57B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUM achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly higher than YUMC's 2.06% return.


YUM

YTD

10.25%

1M

18.03%

6M

9.28%

1Y

12.12%

5Y*

9.01%

10Y*

11.89%

YUMC

YTD

2.06%

1M

10.10%

6M

46.55%

1Y

20.88%

5Y*

2.33%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

YUM vs. YUMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of YUM is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of YUM is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of YUM is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of YUM is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of YUM is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of YUM is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

YUMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of YUMC is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

YUM vs. YUMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for YUM, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.770.65
The chart of Sortino ratio for YUM, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.351.30
The chart of Omega ratio for YUM, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.161.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for YUM, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.180.46
The chart of Martin ratio for YUM, currently valued at 2.73, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.731.60
YUM
YUMC

The current YUM Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the YUMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUM and YUMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.77
0.65
YUM
YUMC

Dividends

YUM vs. YUMC - Dividend Comparison

YUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than YUMC's 1.30% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
YUM
YUM! Brands, Inc.
1.81%2.00%1.87%1.78%1.44%1.73%1.67%1.57%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
1.30%1.33%1.23%0.88%0.96%0.42%1.00%1.25%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

YUM vs. YUMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUM drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than YUMC's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUM and YUMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.56%
-26.25%
YUM
YUMC

Volatility

YUM vs. YUMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) is 10.11%, while Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) has a volatility of 12.38%. This indicates that YUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YUMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.11%
12.38%
YUM
YUMC

Financials

YUM vs. YUMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between YUM! Brands, Inc. and Yum China Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab