PortfoliosLab logo
YUM vs. QSR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between YUM and QSR is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

YUM vs. QSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

YUM:

0.40

QSR:

-0.24

Sortino Ratio

YUM:

0.84

QSR:

-0.23

Omega Ratio

YUM:

1.11

QSR:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

YUM:

0.77

QSR:

-0.26

Martin Ratio

YUM:

1.77

QSR:

-0.71

Ulcer Index

YUM:

5.88%

QSR:

9.13%

Daily Std Dev

YUM:

22.17%

QSR:

23.40%

Max Drawdown

YUM:

-67.69%

QSR:

-63.03%

Current Drawdown

YUM:

-9.48%

QSR:

-15.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

YUM:

$40.98B

QSR:

$30.88B

EPS

YUM:

$5.02

QSR:

$2.95

PE Ratio

YUM:

29.31

QSR:

22.76

PEG Ratio

YUM:

2.17

QSR:

1.18

PS Ratio

YUM:

5.32

QSR:

3.67

PB Ratio

YUM:

0.00

QSR:

7.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

YUM:

$7.74B

QSR:

$6.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

YUM:

$4.05B

QSR:

$3.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

YUM:

$2.95B

QSR:

$2.12B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUM achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly higher than QSR's 3.94% return. Over the past 10 years, YUM has outperformed QSR with an annualized return of 10.23%, while QSR has yielded a comparatively lower 8.11% annualized return.


YUM

YTD

10.19%

1M

1.12%

6M

8.26%

1Y

9.01%

5Y*

13.39%

10Y*

10.23%

QSR

YTD

3.94%

1M

9.40%

6M

0.53%

1Y

-5.11%

5Y*

8.71%

10Y*

8.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

YUM vs. QSR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of YUM is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of YUM is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of YUM is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of YUM is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of YUM is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of YUM is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

QSR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QSR is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QSR is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QSR is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QSR is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QSR is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QSR is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

YUM vs. QSR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current YUM Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the QSR Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUM and QSR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

YUM vs. QSR - Dividend Comparison

YUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than QSR's 3.52% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
YUM
YUM! Brands, Inc.
1.85%2.00%1.87%1.78%1.44%1.73%1.67%1.57%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
3.52%3.56%2.82%3.34%3.49%3.40%3.14%3.44%1.27%1.30%1.18%0.00%

Drawdowns

YUM vs. QSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUM drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than QSR's maximum drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUM and QSR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

YUM vs. QSR - Volatility Comparison

YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) at 5.12%. This indicates that YUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

YUM vs. QSR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B20212022202320242025
1.79B
2.30B
(YUM) Total Revenue
(QSR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

YUM vs. QSR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
70.9%
34.3%
(YUM) Gross Margin
(QSR) Gross Margin
YUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 1.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

QSR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 786.83M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

YUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 965.00M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.0%.

QSR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 635.00M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

YUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 253.00M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.

QSR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 259.00M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.