PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YQQQ vs. ^IXIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YQQQ
YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF
10.57%-9.97%-4.06%
^IXIC
NASDAQ Composite
-6.03%20.36%9.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YQQQ achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly higher than ^IXIC's -6.03% return.


YQQQ

1D
-1.10%
1M
5.50%
YTD
10.57%
6M
12.35%
1Y
-7.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

^IXIC

1D
1.16%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
-6.03%
6M
-4.02%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
16.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YQQQ vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YQQQ
YQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
YQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
YQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
YQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
YQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

^IXIC
^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YQQQ^IXICDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.42

1.08

-1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.44

1.68

-2.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.24

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

1.98

-2.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.41

7.07

-7.48

YQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YQQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YQQQ and ^IXIC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YQQQ^IXICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

1.08

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.51

-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between YQQQ and ^IXIC is -0.93. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Drawdowns

YQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YQQQ drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, smaller than the maximum ^IXIC drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YQQQ and ^IXIC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YQQQ^IXICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.85%

-77.93%

+53.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.85%

-13.26%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.77%

-8.84%

-3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-21.46%

+8.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.68%

3.71%

+14.97%

Volatility

YQQQ vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) is 5.37%, while NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that YQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YQQQ^IXICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

7.06%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

13.09%

-3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

23.33%

-6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

22.44%

-6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

21.97%

-5.59%