PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YOLO vs. DWSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YOLO vs. DWSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YOLO achieves a -11.82% return, which is significantly lower than DWSH's 0.85% return.


YOLO

1D
-5.83%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
-11.82%
6M
0.34%
1Y
48.47%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
-31.60%
10Y*

DWSH

1D
2.36%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.07%
1Y
-10.40%
3Y*
-4.14%
5Y*
-1.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YOLO vs. DWSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
-11.82%36.36%-17.81%-15.10%-72.21%-20.48%47.17%-50.02%
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
0.85%-2.57%5.98%-22.04%17.45%-25.74%-49.95%-1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between YOLO and DWSH is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019

-0.45

The correlation between YOLO and DWSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (5 years) to -0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

YOLO vs. DWSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YOLO
DWSH

Financial Services

61.5%
-8.9%

Healthcare

24.3%
-12.0%

Consumer Defensive

13.4%
-7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%
-12.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
-5.9%

Basic Materials

-

-0.8%

Communication Services

-

-4.5%

Energy

-

-1.1%

Industrials

-

-13.5%

Technology

-

-25.6%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

YOLO
61.5%
DWSH
-8.9%

Healthcare

YOLO
24.3%
DWSH
-12.0%

Consumer Defensive

YOLO
13.4%
DWSH
-7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

YOLO
0.9%
DWSH
-12.6%

Real Estate

YOLO
0.7%
DWSH
-5.9%

Basic Materials

YOLO

-

DWSH
-0.8%

Communication Services

YOLO

-

DWSH
-4.5%

Energy

YOLO

-

DWSH
-1.1%

Industrials

YOLO

-

DWSH
-13.5%

Technology

YOLO

-

DWSH
-25.6%

Utilities

YOLO

-

DWSH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YOLO vs. DWSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YOLO
YOLO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
YOLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YOLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
YOLO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
YOLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
YOLO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DWSH
DWSH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DWSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWSH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DWSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWSH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YOLO vs. DWSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YOLODWSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.93

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

-0.58

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

-0.88

+3.11

YOLO vs. DWSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YOLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the DWSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YOLO and DWSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YOLODWSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

-0.50

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.59

-0.06

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.48

-0.43

-0.05

Drawdowns

YOLO vs. DWSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YOLO drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, which is greater than DWSH's maximum drawdown of -82.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YOLO and DWSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YOLODWSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.68%

-82.73%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.09%

-18.08%

-23.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.45%

-29.23%

-37.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.47%

-32.87%

-59.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.68%

-81.25%

-8.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.94%

-63.61%

-5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.83%

11.82%

+10.01%

Volatility

YOLO vs. DWSH - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a higher volatility of 12.79% compared to AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) at 6.08%. This indicates that YOLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YOLODWSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.79%

6.08%

+6.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.52%

13.93%

+38.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.56%

21.19%

+53.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.64%

25.93%

+27.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.36%

31.22%

+20.14%

YOLO vs. DWSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

YOLO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DWSH's 3.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

YOLO vs. DWSH - Dividend Comparison

YOLO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
6.26%6.31%6.17%10.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.12%
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%3.57%1.17%0.55%3.93%2.03%4.52%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YOLO and DWSH have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YOLO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to DWSH (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YOLO dropped -94.68% vs DWSH's -82.73%.

On 5-year performance, DWSH leads with -1.61% vs -31.60% for YOLO. On fees, YOLO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DWSH has performed better with a -1.61% return vs -31.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YOLO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.

DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 0.00% for YOLO.

YOLO is categorized as Cannabis, while DWSH is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for YOLO and 3.67% for DWSH.

YOLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YOLO and DWSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer