YOLO vs. DWSH
YOLO (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF) and DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YOLO is a Cannabis fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while DWSH is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, YOLO returned -31.60%/yr vs -1.61%/yr for DWSH. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. YOLO charges 0.75%/yr vs 3.67%/yr for DWSH.
Performance
YOLO vs. DWSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YOLO achieves a -11.82% return, which is significantly lower than DWSH's 0.85% return.
YOLO
- 1D
- -5.83%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- YTD
- -11.82%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 48.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- -31.60%
- 10Y*
- —
DWSH
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- -10.40%
- 3Y*
- -4.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
YOLO vs. DWSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | -11.82% | 36.36% | -17.81% | -15.10% | -72.21% | -20.48% | 47.17% | -50.02% |
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 0.85% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 17.45% | -25.74% | -49.95% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between YOLO and DWSH is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019 | -0.45 |
The correlation between YOLO and DWSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (5 years) to -0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
YOLO vs. DWSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YOLO
DWSH
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
YOLO
DWSH
Healthcare
YOLO
DWSH
Consumer Defensive
YOLO
DWSH
Consumer Cyclical
YOLO
DWSH
Real Estate
YOLO
DWSH
Basic Materials
YOLO
-
DWSH
Communication Services
YOLO
-
DWSH
Energy
YOLO
-
DWSH
Industrials
YOLO
-
DWSH
Technology
YOLO
-
DWSH
Utilities
YOLO
-
DWSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YOLO vs. DWSH — Risk / Return Rank
YOLO
DWSH
YOLO vs. DWSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YOLO | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.93 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | -0.58 | +1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.23 | -0.88 | +3.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YOLO | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | -0.50 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.59 | -0.06 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | -0.43 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
YOLO vs. DWSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YOLO drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, which is greater than DWSH's maximum drawdown of -82.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YOLO and DWSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YOLO | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.68% | -82.73% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.09% | -18.08% | -23.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.45% | -29.23% | -37.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.47% | -32.87% | -59.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.68% | -81.25% | -8.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.94% | -63.61% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.83% | 11.82% | +10.01% |
Volatility
YOLO vs. DWSH - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a higher volatility of 12.79% compared to AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) at 6.08%. This indicates that YOLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YOLO | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.79% | 6.08% | +6.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.52% | 13.93% | +38.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.56% | 21.19% | +53.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.64% | 25.93% | +27.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.36% | 31.22% | +20.14% |
YOLO vs. DWSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
YOLO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DWSH's 3.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
YOLO vs. DWSH - Dividend Comparison
YOLO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.26% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.57% | 1.17% | 0.55% | 3.93% | 2.03% | 4.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YOLO and DWSH have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YOLO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to DWSH (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YOLO dropped -94.68% vs DWSH's -82.73%.
On 5-year performance, DWSH leads with -1.61% vs -31.60% for YOLO. On fees, YOLO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DWSH has performed better with a -1.61% return vs -31.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YOLO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 0.00% for YOLO.
YOLO is categorized as Cannabis, while DWSH is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for YOLO and 3.67% for DWSH.
YOLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YOLO and DWSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer