PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YOLO vs. DWSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YOLO vs. DWSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YOLO vs. DWSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
-19.09%36.36%-17.81%-15.10%-72.21%-20.48%47.17%-50.02%
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
2.10%-2.57%5.98%-22.04%17.45%-25.74%-49.95%-1.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YOLO achieves a -19.09% return, which is significantly lower than DWSH's 2.10% return.


YOLO

1D
1.52%
1M
-6.64%
YTD
-19.09%
6M
-23.28%
1Y
50.85%
3Y*
-1.62%
5Y*
-34.43%
10Y*

DWSH

1D
0.31%
1M
5.78%
YTD
2.10%
6M
3.06%
1Y
-6.76%
3Y*
-3.33%
5Y*
-2.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YOLO vs. DWSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

YOLO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DWSH's 3.67% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YOLO vs. DWSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YOLO
YOLO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
YOLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YOLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
YOLO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
YOLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
YOLO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DWSH
DWSH Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DWSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWSH Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DWSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWSH Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YOLO vs. DWSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YOLODWSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

-0.24

+0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

-0.15

+1.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.98

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

-0.24

+1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.75

-0.32

+3.07

YOLO vs. DWSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YOLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the DWSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YOLO and DWSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YOLODWSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

-0.24

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.66

-0.09

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.51

-0.43

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between YOLO and DWSH is -0.44. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

YOLO vs. DWSH - Dividend Comparison

YOLO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%3.57%1.17%0.55%3.93%2.03%4.52%0.00%
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
6.18%6.31%6.17%10.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.12%

Drawdowns

YOLO vs. DWSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YOLO drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, which is greater than DWSH's maximum drawdown of -82.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YOLO and DWSH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YOLODWSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.68%

-82.73%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.09%

-29.23%

-11.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.23%

-32.87%

-60.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.54%

-81.02%

-9.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.44%

-63.21%

-5.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.46%

21.82%

-3.36%

Volatility

YOLO vs. DWSH - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a higher volatility of 15.29% compared to AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) at 5.19%. This indicates that YOLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YOLODWSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.29%

5.19%

+10.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.82%

13.92%

+36.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.85%

27.77%

+44.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.54%

25.72%

+26.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.88%

31.42%

+19.46%