PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAX vs. TQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAX vs. TQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAX achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than TQQY's 8.28% return.


YMAX

1D
-1.70%
1M
6.76%
YTD
6.06%
6M
3.56%
1Y
9.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TQQY

1D
0.11%
1M
5.38%
YTD
8.28%
6M
5.78%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAX vs. TQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YMAX and TQQY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

0.71

The correlation between YMAX and TQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAX vs. TQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAX
YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQY
TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAX vs. TQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YMAXTQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.20

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

1.03

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

2.53

-1.70

YMAX vs. TQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the TQQY Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAX and TQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YMAXTQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

0.95

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.09

+0.60

Drawdowns

YMAX vs. TQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAX drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQY drawdown of -25.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX and TQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAXTQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.13%

-25.31%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.13%

-19.35%

-6.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

-3.27%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-9.63%

+3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.99%

7.87%

+3.12%

Volatility

YMAX vs. TQQY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) at 1.90%. This indicates that YMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAXTQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

1.90%

+4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.10%

14.80%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

20.92%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.97%

23.91%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.97%

23.91%

-0.94%

YMAX vs. TQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQY's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAX vs. TQQY - Dividend Comparison

YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 72.94%, more than TQQY's 59.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
TQQY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF
59.51%49.61%0.00%
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
72.94%78.70%44.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


YMAX and TQQY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YMAX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to TQQY (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAX dropped -26.13% vs TQQY's -25.31%.

On 1-year performance, TQQY leads with 19.85% vs 9.02% for YMAX. On fees, TQQY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, TQQY has been the lower-risk option at 1.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TQQY has performed better with a 19.85% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 72.94%, compared with 59.51% for TQQY.

YMAX is categorized as Derivative Income, while TQQY is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAX and 1.07% for TQQY.

TQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAX and TQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer