YMAX vs. BUFH
YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YMAX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YMAX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
YMAX vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YMAX achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.
YMAX
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- 9.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAX vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs | 6.06% | -0.66% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between YMAX and BUFH is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YMAX vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
YMAX
BUFH
YMAX vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YMAX | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YMAX | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 2.91 | -2.21 |
Drawdowns
YMAX vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YMAX drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YMAX | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -1.53% | -24.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -0.05% | -5.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -0.18% | -6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.99% | — | — |
Volatility
YMAX vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YMAX | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 2.37% | +19.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 2.37% | +20.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 2.37% | +20.60% |
YMAX vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
YMAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
YMAX vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 72.94%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs | 72.94% | 78.70% | 44.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YMAX and BUFH have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUFH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUFH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.
YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 72.94%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
YMAX is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAX and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for YMAX and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer