PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAR vs. FDND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAR vs. FDND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAR achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly higher than FDND's 2.42% return.


YMAR

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.52%
YTD
5.29%
6M
6.66%
1Y
13.02%
3Y*
10.63%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*

FDND

1D
-1.99%
1M
3.57%
YTD
2.42%
6M
1.71%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAR vs. FDND - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YMAR and FDND is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAR vs. FDND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAR
YMAR Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
YMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FDND
FDND Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAR vs. FDND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YMARFDNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.08

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

0.36

+3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.21

0.88

+15.33

YMAR vs. FDND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the FDND Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAR and FDND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YMARFDNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

0.40

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.60

+0.02

Drawdowns

YMAR vs. FDND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAR drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, smaller than the maximum FDND drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAR and FDND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMARFDNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.60%

-24.12%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-20.49%

+17.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-4.24%

+3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-5.67%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

8.39%

-7.58%

Volatility

YMAR vs. FDND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) is 2.03%, while FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that YMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMARFDNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

5.29%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.26%

14.07%

-8.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.92%

18.28%

-11.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.35%

21.40%

-10.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

21.40%

-10.14%

YMAR vs. FDND - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAR has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FDND's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAR vs. FDND - Dividend Comparison

YMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YMAR and FDND have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDND has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to YMAR (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAR dropped -22.60% vs FDND's -24.12%.

On 1-year performance, YMAR leads with 13.02% vs 7.37% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, YMAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YMAR has performed better with a 13.02% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YMAR.

FDND has the higher dividend yield at 7.98%, compared with 0.00% for YMAR.

YMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FDND is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YMAR and 0.75% for FDND.

YMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAR and FDND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer