YMAG vs. NVDW
YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) and NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YMAG returned 24.05% vs 51.10% for NVDW. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YMAG charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVDW.
Performance
YMAG vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than NVDW's 12.02% return.
YMAG
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 24.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDW
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 51.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAG vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 1.30% | 22.37% |
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 12.02% | 40.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between YMAG and NVDW is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025 | 0.63 |
The correlation between YMAG and NVDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YMAG vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank
YMAG
NVDW
YMAG vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YMAG | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 2.01 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 4.84 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YMAG | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.23 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 1.35 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
YMAG vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDW drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and NVDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YMAG | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -25.54% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -25.54% | +11.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -13.69% | +8.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -8.24% | +3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 10.59% | -6.48% |
Volatility
YMAG vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) is 4.87%, while Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a volatility of 15.23%. This indicates that YMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YMAG | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 15.23% | -10.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 31.58% | -19.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.29% | 41.74% | -25.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 41.59% | -20.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 41.59% | -20.64% |
YMAG vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
YMAG vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison
YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.73%, less than NVDW's 61.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 61.31% | 38.94% | 0.00% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 51.73% | 52.27% | 35.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YMAG and NVDW have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDW has higher volatility (15.23%) compared to YMAG (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAG dropped -25.96% vs NVDW's -25.54%.
On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 51.10% vs 24.05% for YMAG. On fees, NVDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 51.10% return vs 24.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 61.31%, compared with 51.73% for YMAG.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 0.99% for NVDW.
YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YMAG and NVDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer