YMAG vs. LFGY
YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) and LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YMAG returned 16.04% vs -9.94% for LFGY. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YMAG charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for LFGY.
Performance
YMAG vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 8.72% return.
YMAG
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.47%
LFGY
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- -9.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.96%
YMAG vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 1.19% | 19.80% |
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 8.72% | -9.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between YMAG and LFGY is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025 | 0.64 |
The correlation between YMAG and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
YMAG vs. LFGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YMAG
LFGY
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
YMAG
LFGY
Basic Materials
YMAG
-
LFGY
-
Communication Services
YMAG
-
LFGY
Consumer Cyclical
YMAG
-
LFGY
Consumer Defensive
YMAG
-
LFGY
-
Energy
YMAG
-
LFGY
-
Healthcare
YMAG
-
LFGY
-
Industrials
YMAG
-
LFGY
-
Real Estate
YMAG
-
LFGY
-
Technology
YMAG
-
LFGY
Utilities
YMAG
-
LFGY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YMAG vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank
YMAG
LFGY
YMAG vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YMAG | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.99 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | -0.28 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.39 | -0.58 | +3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YMAG vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, smaller than the maximum LFGY drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and LFGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YMAG | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -35.94% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -35.94% | +21.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -16.95% | +11.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -14.06% | +9.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 17.19% | -12.45% |
Volatility
YMAG vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) is 6.23%, while YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that YMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YMAG | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 11.39% | -5.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.64% | 32.38% | -18.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.47% | 39.55% | -22.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 42.27% | -21.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 42.27% | -21.29% |
YMAG vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than LFGY's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
YMAG vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison
YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.07%, less than LFGY's 85.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 85.09% | 94.90% | 0.00% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 51.07% | 52.27% | 35.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YMAG and LFGY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFGY has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to YMAG (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAG dropped -25.96% vs LFGY's -35.94%.
On 1-year performance, YMAG leads with 16.04% vs -9.94% for LFGY. On fees, LFGY is cheaper at 1.02% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 6.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YMAG has performed better with a 16.04% return vs -9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LFGY is cheaper with a 1.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 85.09%, compared with 51.07% for YMAG.
Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 1.02% for LFGY.
YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YMAG and LFGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer