PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAG vs. GPTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAG vs. GPTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than GPTY's 29.45% return.


YMAG

1D
0.09%
1M
-6.10%
YTD
-1.13%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
20.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPTY

1D
0.32%
1M
7.39%
YTD
29.45%
6M
28.73%
1Y
46.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAG vs. GPTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YMAG and GPTY is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.76

The correlation between YMAG and GPTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

YMAG vs. GPTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YMAG
GPTY

Financial Services

98.9%
4.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

78.5%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

YMAG
98.9%
GPTY
4.2%

Basic Materials

YMAG

-

GPTY

-

Communication Services

YMAG

-

GPTY
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

YMAG

-

GPTY
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

YMAG

-

GPTY

-

Energy

YMAG

-

GPTY

-

Healthcare

YMAG

-

GPTY

-

Industrials

YMAG

-

GPTY

-

Real Estate

YMAG

-

GPTY

-

Technology

YMAG

-

GPTY
78.5%

Utilities

YMAG

-

GPTY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAG vs. GPTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAG
YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GPTY
GPTY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GPTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GPTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPTY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAG vs. GPTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YMAGGPTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.36

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

6.21

-1.53

YMAG vs. GPTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the GPTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAG and GPTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YMAG vs. GPTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, roughly equal to the maximum GPTY drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and GPTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAGGPTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-26.62%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.38%

-19.32%

+4.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.32%

-6.41%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-6.51%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

7.33%

-3.12%

Volatility

YMAG vs. GPTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) is 5.03%, while YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) has a volatility of 11.88%. This indicates that YMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAGGPTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

11.88%

-6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

20.45%

-8.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.41%

25.17%

-8.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

29.64%

-8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

29.64%

-8.70%

YMAG vs. GPTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than GPTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAG vs. GPTY - Dividend Comparison

YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.85%, more than GPTY's 33.93% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


YMAG and GPTY have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPTY has higher volatility (11.88%) compared to YMAG (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAG dropped -25.96% vs GPTY's -26.62%.

On 1-year performance, GPTY leads with 46.73% vs 20.61% for YMAG. On fees, GPTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPTY has performed better with a 46.73% return vs 20.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 52.85%, compared with 33.93% for GPTY.

Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 0.99% for GPTY.

GPTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAG and GPTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer