PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YLD vs. HYLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YLD vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YLD achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly higher than HYLB's 1.65% return.


YLD

1D
0.13%
1M
0.39%
YTD
2.97%
6M
3.53%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
8.69%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
5.73%

HYLB

1D
0.11%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.09%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
4.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YLD vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
2.97%6.55%9.19%12.93%-8.78%9.17%1.50%13.58%-3.30%9.12%
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.65%8.74%8.14%12.03%-10.80%3.94%5.04%14.06%-1.80%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between YLD and HYLB is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2016

0.58

The correlation between YLD and HYLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YLD vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YLD
YLD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
YLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
YLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
YLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
YLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLB
HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YLD vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YLDHYLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.00

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.81

12.90

-0.10

YLD vs. HYLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the HYLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YLD and HYLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YLDHYLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.84

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.55

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.58

+0.07

Drawdowns

YLD vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YLD drawdown since its inception was -28.34%, which is greater than HYLB's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YLD and HYLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YLDHYLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.34%

-22.91%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-2.27%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.62%

-4.51%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.89%

-15.54%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.09%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-2.43%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.53%

+0.04%

Volatility

YLD vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison

Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) at 1.19%. This indicates that YLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YLDHYLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

1.19%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

2.92%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

3.70%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

7.47%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.21%

8.18%

+0.03%

YLD vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

YLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

YLD vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison

YLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than HYLB's 6.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.48%6.29%6.31%5.84%5.53%4.45%5.22%5.71%5.95%5.85%0.27%0.00%
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
7.26%7.33%7.12%6.46%6.51%3.92%4.40%4.81%5.42%6.28%4.47%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


YLD and HYLB have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YLD has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to HYLB (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YLD dropped -28.34% vs HYLB's -22.91%.

On 5-year performance, YLD leads with 4.77% vs 4.06% for HYLB. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HYLB has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YLD has performed better with a 4.77% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for YLD.

YLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 6.48% for HYLB.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for YLD and 0.15% for HYLB.

HYLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YLD and HYLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer