YINN vs. SBU
YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) and SBU (Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. YINN is passively managed, while SBU is actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YINN charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SBU.
Performance
YINN vs. SBU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -48.49% return, which is significantly lower than SBU's 39.21% return.
YINN
- 1D
- -6.38%
- 1M
- -30.18%
- YTD
- -48.49%
- 6M
- -49.76%
- 1Y
- -47.64%
- 3Y*
- -11.77%
- 5Y*
- -42.90%
- 10Y*
- -20.45%
SBU
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 39.21%
- 6M
- 37.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YINN vs. SBU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | -48.49% | -12.13% |
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 39.21% | -6.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between YINN and SBU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YINN vs. SBU — Risk / Return Rank
YINN
SBU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YINN vs. SBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YINN | SBU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YINN vs. SBU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than SBU's maximum drawdown of -28.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and SBU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YINN | SBU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.87% | -28.10% | -70.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.17% | -8.50% | -89.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.57% | -7.39% | -61.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.29% | — | — |
Volatility
YINN vs. SBU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YINN | SBU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.76% | 59.15% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.34% | 59.15% | +35.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.59% | 59.15% | +22.44% |
YINN vs. SBU - Expense Ratio Comparison
YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SBU's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
YINN vs. SBU - Dividend Comparison
YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while SBU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBU Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | 1.73% | 1.12% | 1.81% | 4.17% | 1.16% | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.38% | 1.02% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YINN and SBU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SBU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.
YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for SBU.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 0.75% for SBU.
Find the right allocation for YINN and SBU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer