YINN vs. MINT
YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YINN is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. YINN is passively managed, while MINT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, YINN returned -19.74%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for MINT. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. YINN charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.
Performance
YINN vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -42.95% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, YINN has underperformed MINT with an annualized return of -19.74%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.72% annualized return.
YINN
- 1D
- -6.15%
- 1M
- -21.32%
- YTD
- -42.95%
- 6M
- -44.25%
- 1Y
- -37.35%
- 3Y*
- -8.25%
- 5Y*
- -41.05%
- 10Y*
- -19.74%
MINT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
YINN vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | -42.95% | 54.21% | 36.06% | -53.08% | -71.97% | -58.56% | -7.75% | 28.92% | -48.47% | 129.79% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 2.05% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between YINN and MINT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2009 | -0.01 |
The correlation between YINN and MINT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YINN vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
YINN
MINT
YINN vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YINN | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -61.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 18.98 | -18.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 94.18 | -94.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 866.10 | -867.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YINN vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YINN | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.87% | -4.62% | -94.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.99% | -0.05% | -56.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.08% | -0.16% | -68.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.28% | -2.42% | -93.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.59% | -4.62% | -93.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.98% | -0.02% | -97.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.55% | -0.17% | -68.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.77% | 0.01% | +26.76% |
Volatility
YINN vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 18.21% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.11%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YINN | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.21% | 0.11% | +18.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.73% | 0.21% | +43.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.15% | 0.28% | +58.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.33% | 0.58% | +93.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.59% | 0.95% | +80.64% |
YINN vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
YINN vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | 1.75% | 1.12% | 1.81% | 4.17% | 1.16% | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.38% | 1.02% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YINN and MINT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YINN has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to MINT (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs MINT's -4.62%.
On 10-year performance, MINT leads with 2.72% vs -19.74% for YINN. On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MINT has performed better with a 2.72% return vs -19.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.
MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 1.75% for YINN.
YINN is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 0.36% for MINT.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.86 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YINN and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer