PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YGLD vs. GBUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YGLD vs. GBUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YGLD achieves a -20.87% return, which is significantly lower than GBUG's -13.34% return.


YGLD

1D
-4.09%
1M
-7.59%
6M
-28.00%
YTD
-20.87%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GBUG

1D
-3.59%
1M
-6.07%
6M
-20.46%
YTD
-13.34%
1Y
49.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YGLD vs. GBUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YGLD and GBUG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.77

The correlation between YGLD and GBUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YGLD vs. GBUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YGLD
YGLD Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
YGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
YGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
YGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
YGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GBUG
GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YGLD vs. GBUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YGLDGBUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.20

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

1.36

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.25

3.16

-2.91

YGLD vs. GBUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the GBUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YGLD and GBUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YGLD vs. GBUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YGLD drawdown since its inception was -42.90%, which is greater than GBUG's maximum drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YGLD and GBUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YGLDGBUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.90%

-36.90%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.90%

-36.90%

-6.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.90%

-34.92%

-7.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.92%

-9.37%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.47%

15.88%

+3.59%

Volatility

YGLD vs. GBUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) is 11.47%, while Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) has a volatility of 16.50%. This indicates that YGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YGLDGBUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.47%

16.50%

-5.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.91%

42.63%

-6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.25%

50.86%

-8.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.38%

48.54%

-9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.38%

48.54%

-9.16%

YGLD vs. GBUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

YGLD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GBUG's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

YGLD vs. GBUG - Dividend Comparison

YGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.04%, more than GBUG's 1.80% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


YGLD and GBUG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBUG has higher volatility (16.50%) compared to YGLD (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YGLD dropped -42.90% vs GBUG's -36.90%.

On 1-year performance, GBUG leads with 49.96% vs 4.85% for YGLD. On fees, YGLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, YGLD has been the lower-risk option at 11.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GBUG has performed better with a 49.96% return vs 4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YGLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for GBUG.

YGLD has the higher dividend yield at 22.04%, compared with 1.80% for GBUG.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for YGLD and 0.89% for GBUG.

GBUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YGLD and GBUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer