YFYA vs. WEAT
YFYA (Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF) and WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - YFYA is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Teucrium, while WEAT is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark. YFYA is actively managed, while WEAT is passively managed. Over the past year, YFYA returned 4.84% vs -2.52% for WEAT. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. YFYA charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for WEAT.
Performance
YFYA vs. WEAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YFYA achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than WEAT's 12.52% return.
YFYA
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEAT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- -2.52%
- 3Y*
- -10.84%
- 5Y*
- -8.11%
- 10Y*
- -7.13%
YFYA vs. WEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF | 1.93% | 2.88% |
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 12.52% | -19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between YFYA and WEAT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YFYA vs. WEAT — Risk / Return Rank
YFYA
WEAT
YFYA vs. WEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YFYA | WEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.00 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | -0.14 | +3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.74 | -0.22 | +13.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YFYA | WEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | -0.11 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | -0.41 | +1.42 |
Drawdowns
YFYA vs. WEAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YFYA drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum WEAT drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFYA and WEAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YFYA | WEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -84.32% | +82.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.61% | -17.85% | +16.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -46.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -67.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -82.27% | +81.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -63.13% | +62.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 11.32% | -10.97% |
Volatility
YFYA vs. WEAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) is 1.23%, while Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that YFYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YFYA | WEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 9.88% | -8.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.37% | 18.06% | -14.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61% | 22.64% | -19.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 30.50% | -26.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 26.80% | -23.20% |
YFYA vs. WEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
YFYA has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than WEAT's 1.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
YFYA vs. WEAT - Dividend Comparison
YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, while WEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF | 5.16% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YFYA and WEAT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEAT has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to YFYA (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFYA dropped -2.29% vs WEAT's -84.32%.
On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 4.84% vs -2.52% for WEAT. On fees, YFYA is cheaper at 1.16% per year. On volatility, YFYA has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 4.84% return vs -2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YFYA is cheaper with a 1.16% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.
YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.00% for WEAT.
YFYA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while WEAT is Agricultural Commodities. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for YFYA and 1.91% for WEAT.
YFYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YFYA and WEAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer