YFYA vs. CUSD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

YFYA (Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF) and CUSD (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YFYA returned 4.84% vs 3.36% for CUSD. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YFYA charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for CUSD.

Performance

YFYA vs. CUSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFYA achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly higher than CUSD's 1.42% return.

YFYA

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 6M: 2.23%
• 1Y: 4.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CUSD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: 3.36%
• 3Y*: 4.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFYA vs. CUSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF	1.93%	2.88%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	1.42%	4.54%

Correlation

The correlation between YFYA and CUSD is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

YFYA vs. CUSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFYA

YFYA Risk / Return Rank: 54
YFYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
YFYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
YFYA Omega Ratio Rank: 58
YFYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
YFYA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

CUSD

CUSD Risk / Return Rank: 15
CUSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CUSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CUSD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CUSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
CUSD Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFYA vs. CUSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YFYA	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	0.25	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	0.48	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.07	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	0.62	+2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.74	1.63	+12.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YFYA vs. CUSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the CUSD Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFYA and CUSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YFYA	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	0.25	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	0.65	+0.35

Drawdowns

YFYA vs. CUSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFYA drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum CUSD drawdown of -5.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFYA and CUSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	YFYA	CUSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.29%	-5.42%	+3.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.61%	-5.42%	+3.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-2.75%	+2.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.33%	-0.46%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	2.06%	-1.71%

Volatility

YFYA vs. CUSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) is 1.23%, while CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that YFYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YFYA	CUSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.23%	4.32%	-3.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.37%	10.95%	-7.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61%	13.67%	-10.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.60%	7.02%	-3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.60%	7.02%	-3.42%

YFYA vs. CUSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFYA has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than CUSD's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

YFYA vs. CUSD - Dividend Comparison

YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than CUSD's 13.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	13.85%	14.05%	7.10%	3.62%	1.14%
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF	5.16%	3.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YFYA and CUSD in my portfolio?

YFYA and CUSD have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YFYA or CUSD?

CUSD has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to YFYA (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFYA dropped -2.29% vs CUSD's -5.42%.

Which ETF is better, YFYA or CUSD?

On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 4.84% vs 3.36% for CUSD. On fees, CUSD is cheaper at 0.81% per year. On volatility, YFYA has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YFYA or CUSD?

Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 4.84% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YFYA or CUSD?

CUSD is cheaper with a 0.81% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YFYA or CUSD?

CUSD has the higher dividend yield at 13.85%, compared with 5.16% for YFYA.

What is the main difference between YFYA and CUSD?

They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and CrossingBridge. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for YFYA and 0.81% for CUSD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YFYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.