CUSD vs. CGUI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CUSD (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF) and CGUI (Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CUSD returned 6.58% vs 4.21% for CGUI. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CUSD charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CGUI.

Performance

CUSD vs. CGUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) and Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUSD achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly higher than CGUI's 1.64% return.

CUSD

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 4.97%
• 6M: 5.87%
• 1Y: 6.58%
• 3Y*: 5.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGUI

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 4.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CUSD vs. CGUI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	4.97%	5.02%	2.23%
CGUI Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF	1.64%	4.99%	3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CUSD and CGUI is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024	0.07

Return for Risk

CUSD vs. CGUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUSD

CUSD Risk / Return Rank: 20
CUSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CUSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
CUSD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CUSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
CUSD Martin Ratio Rank: 25

CGUI

CGUI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CGUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CGUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CGUI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CGUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CGUI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUSD vs. CGUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) and Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CUSD	CGUI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	5.78	-5.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	10.40	-9.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	2.56	-1.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	23.82	-22.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.09	99.46	-96.37

CUSD vs. CGUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUSD Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the CGUI Sharpe Ratio of 5.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUSD and CGUI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CUSD vs. CGUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUSD drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, which is greater than CGUI's maximum drawdown of -0.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUSD and CGUI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CUSD	CGUI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.42%	-0.18%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.42%	-0.18%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.04%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.48%	-0.02%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	0.04%	+2.10%

Volatility

CUSD vs. CGUI - Volatility Comparison

CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) at 0.23%. This indicates that CUSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CUSD	CGUI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	0.23%	+5.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.99%	0.56%	+11.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.64%	0.73%	+13.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.39%	0.80%	+6.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.39%	0.80%	+6.59%

CUSD vs. CGUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUSD has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than CGUI's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

CUSD vs. CGUI - Dividend Comparison

CUSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.39%, more than CGUI's 3.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGUI Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF	3.88%	4.17%	2.62%	0.00%	0.00%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	13.39%	14.05%	7.10%	3.62%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CUSD and CGUI in my portfolio?

CUSD and CGUI have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CUSD or CGUI?

CUSD has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to CGUI (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUSD dropped -5.42% vs CGUI's -0.18%.

Which ETF is better, CUSD or CGUI?

On 1-year performance, CUSD leads with 6.58% vs 4.21% for CGUI. On fees, CGUI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CGUI has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CUSD or CGUI?

Over the 1-year period, CUSD has performed better with a 6.58% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CUSD or CGUI?

CGUI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for CUSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CUSD or CGUI?

CUSD has the higher dividend yield at 13.39%, compared with 3.88% for CGUI.

What is the main difference between CUSD and CGUI?

They also come from different issuers: CrossingBridge and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for CUSD and 0.18% for CGUI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.78 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.