PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YFSNX vs. GAAEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YFSNX vs. GAAEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFSNX achieves a 21.13% return, which is significantly higher than GAAEX's 14.96% return.


YFSNX

1D
1.77%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
21.13%
6M
22.34%
1Y
19.06%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*

GAAEX

1D
1.39%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
14.96%
6M
13.71%
1Y
29.84%
3Y*
6.02%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
11.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFSNX vs. GAAEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
21.13%14.79%-0.47%16.48%-9.39%13.00%18.32%24.48%2.18%20.95%
GAAEX
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund
14.96%26.64%-11.85%-2.39%-12.67%8.40%86.45%30.20%-15.49%16.50%

Correlation

The correlation between YFSNX and GAAEX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.65

The correlation between YFSNX and GAAEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YFSNX vs. GAAEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFSNX
YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GAAEX
GAAEX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GAAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GAAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFSNX vs. GAAEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) and Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YFSNXGAAEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.25

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

7.70

-3.37

YFSNX vs. GAAEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFSNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the GAAEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFSNX and GAAEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YFSNX vs. GAAEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFSNX drawdown since its inception was -35.14%, smaller than the maximum GAAEX drawdown of -85.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFSNX and GAAEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YFSNXGAAEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.14%

-85.83%

+50.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.09%

-14.57%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-35.21%

+20.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-40.64%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.46%

-50.96%

+45.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-63.60%

+58.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

4.25%

+0.32%

Volatility

YFSNX vs. GAAEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) is 7.47%, while Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that YFSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAAEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YFSNXGAAEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

9.20%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.33%

16.85%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.09%

20.73%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

22.71%

-7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

22.41%

-6.08%

YFSNX vs. GAAEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFSNX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than GAAEX's 1.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

YFSNX vs. GAAEX - Dividend Comparison

YFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GAAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAAEX
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund
0.28%0.33%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.28%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
0.00%0.00%8.40%7.86%4.33%8.06%4.71%6.59%0.71%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


YFSNX and GAAEX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAAEX has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to YFSNX (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFSNX dropped -35.14% vs GAAEX's -85.83%.

GAAEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YFSNX and GAAEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer