YETH vs. QYLD
YETH (Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YETH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. YETH is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, YETH returned -31.39% vs 23.70% for QYLD. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
YETH vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YETH achieves a -33.84% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.
YETH
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -22.71%
- YTD
- -33.84%
- 6M
- -33.94%
- 1Y
- -31.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
YETH vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | -33.84% | -32.10% | 24.84% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 9.28% | 8.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between YETH and QYLD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YETH vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
YETH
QYLD
YETH vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YETH | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.63 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 4.79 | -5.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 28.10 | -29.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YETH | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 2.78 | -3.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | 0.59 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
YETH vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YETH drawdown since its inception was -61.73%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YETH and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YETH | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.73% | -24.75% | -36.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.63% | -4.97% | -50.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.58% | -0.06% | -59.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.99% | -3.84% | -27.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.10% | 0.85% | +30.25% |
Volatility
YETH vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.84%. This indicates that YETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YETH | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 1.84% | +7.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.11% | 7.12% | +30.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.94% | 8.57% | +48.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.37% | 14.70% | +40.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.37% | 15.49% | +39.88% |
YETH vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
YETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
YETH vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
YETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 144.02%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | 144.02% | 109.12% | 20.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YETH and QYLD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YETH has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to QYLD (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YETH dropped -61.73% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 1-year performance, QYLD leads with 23.70% vs -31.39% for YETH. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 23.70% return vs -31.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YETH.
YETH has the higher dividend yield at 144.02%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.
YETH is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YETH and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YETH and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer