YETH vs. QQA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

YETH (Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YETH returned -28.26% vs 28.19% for QQA. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.

Performance

YETH vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YETH achieves a -36.92% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 12.34% return.

YETH

• 1D: -3.80%
• 1M: -17.57%
• YTD: -36.92%
• 6M: -35.32%
• 1Y: -28.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQA

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 12.34%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 28.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YETH vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF	-36.92%	-32.10%	26.02%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	12.34%	17.24%	10.81%

Correlation

The correlation between YETH and QQA is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.50

The correlation between YETH and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

YETH vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YETH

YETH Risk / Return Rank: 5
YETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
YETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
YETH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
YETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
YETH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

QQA

QQA Risk / Return Rank: 67
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YETH vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YETH	QQA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	2.03	-2.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	2.74	-3.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.37	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.48	3.23	-3.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	13.90	-14.75

YETH vs. QQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the QQA Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YETH and QQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YETH vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YETH drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than QQA's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YETH and QQA.

Drawdown Indicators

	YETH	QQA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.41%	-19.73%	-44.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.73%	-8.76%	-49.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.46%	-2.14%	-59.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.73%	-2.53%	-29.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.32%	2.03%	+31.29%

Volatility

YETH vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) at 6.67%. This indicates that YETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YETH	QQA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.69%	6.67%	+11.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.17%	11.28%	+28.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.12%	13.95%	+44.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.79%	18.59%	+37.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.79%	18.59%	+37.20%

YETH vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

YETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

YETH vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

YETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 156.86%, more than QQA's 9.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	9.70%	9.78%	4.29%
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF	156.86%	109.12%	20.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YETH and QQA in my portfolio?

YETH and QQA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YETH or QQA?

YETH has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to QQA (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YETH dropped -64.41% vs QQA's -19.73%.

Which ETF is better, YETH or QQA?

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 28.19% vs -28.26% for YETH. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QQA has been the lower-risk option at 6.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YETH or QQA?

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 28.19% return vs -28.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YETH or QQA?

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YETH or QQA?

YETH has the higher dividend yield at 156.86%, compared with 9.70% for QQA.

What is the main difference between YETH and QQA?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YETH and 0.29% for QQA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.