YEAR vs. XONE
YEAR (AB Ultra Short Income ETF) and XONE (BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YEAR is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while XONE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Target Duration Index. YEAR is actively managed, while XONE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, YEAR returned 4.96%/yr vs 4.55%/yr for XONE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YEAR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for XONE.
Performance
YEAR vs. XONE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with YEAR having a 1.19% return and XONE slightly lower at 1.16%.
YEAR
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XONE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YEAR vs. XONE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YEAR AB Ultra Short Income ETF | 1.19% | 4.69% | 5.41% | 5.85% | 1.13% |
XONE BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 1.16% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 4.74% | 0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between YEAR and XONE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.58 |
The correlation between YEAR and XONE shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YEAR vs. XONE — Risk / Return Rank
YEAR
XONE
YEAR vs. XONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR) and BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YEAR | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.17 | 3.55 | -1.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.58 | 23.89 | -7.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.60 | 138.39 | -64.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YEAR | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.88 | 7.03 | -2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.27 | 4.97 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
YEAR vs. XONE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YEAR drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, which is greater than XONE's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YEAR and XONE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YEAR | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -0.40% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.23% | -0.16% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.43% | -0.28% | -0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.04% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.03% | +0.02% |
Volatility
YEAR vs. XONE - Volatility Comparison
AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR) has a higher volatility of 0.19% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) at 0.09%. This indicates that YEAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YEAR | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | 0.09% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.51% | 0.34% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78% | 0.55% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.15% | 0.86% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.15% | 0.86% | +0.29% |
YEAR vs. XONE - Expense Ratio Comparison
YEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XONE's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
YEAR vs. XONE - Dividend Comparison
YEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than XONE's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XONE BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 4.06% | 4.33% | 5.21% | 4.46% | 1.17% |
YEAR AB Ultra Short Income ETF | 4.14% | 4.33% | 5.16% | 5.00% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YEAR and XONE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YEAR has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to XONE (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YEAR dropped -0.61% vs XONE's -0.40%.
On 3-year performance, YEAR leads with 4.96% vs 4.55% for XONE. On fees, XONE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XONE has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, YEAR has performed better with a 4.96% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XONE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for YEAR.
YEAR has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 4.06% for XONE.
YEAR is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while XONE is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for YEAR and 0.03% for XONE.
XONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.03 vs 4.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YEAR and XONE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer