YDEC vs. NVDO
YDEC (FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YDEC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
YDEC vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YDEC achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 20.98% return.
YDEC
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 5.36%
- 1Y
- 10.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 17.25%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YDEC vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YDEC FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December | 4.73% | 3.03% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 20.98% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between YDEC and NVDO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YDEC vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
YDEC
NVDO
YDEC vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YDEC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YDEC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.39 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
YDEC vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YDEC drawdown since its inception was -23.34%, which is greater than NVDO's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YDEC and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YDEC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.34% | -16.25% | -7.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.93% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -4.97% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | — | — |
Volatility
YDEC vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YDEC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.60% | 31.91% | -25.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 31.91% | -20.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.99% | 31.91% | -20.92% |
YDEC vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
YDEC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
YDEC vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
YDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 13.77% | 16.66% |
YDEC FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YDEC and NVDO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YDEC.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.77%, compared with 0.00% for YDEC.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YDEC and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for YDEC and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer