PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YDEC vs. IXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YDEC vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YDEC achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 22.29% return.


YDEC

1D
-0.64%
1M
0.42%
YTD
4.60%
6M
4.60%
1Y
10.37%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*

IXC

1D
0.44%
1M
-8.68%
YTD
22.29%
6M
23.05%
1Y
31.78%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
17.77%
10Y*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YDEC vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
YDEC
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December
4.60%16.04%-0.79%14.33%-6.37%5.25%1.87%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
22.29%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between YDEC and IXC is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2020

0.37

The correlation between YDEC and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

YDEC vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YDEC
IXC

Financial Services

24.3%

-

Industrials

19.5%

-

Technology

11.5%

-

Healthcare

10.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.6%

-

Basic Materials

6.1%

-

Communication Services

4.8%

-

Energy

3.7%
100.0%

Utilities

3.7%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Financial Services

YDEC
24.3%
IXC

-

Industrials

YDEC
19.5%
IXC

-

Technology

YDEC
11.5%
IXC

-

Healthcare

YDEC
10.4%
IXC

-

Consumer Cyclical

YDEC
7.8%
IXC

-

Consumer Defensive

YDEC
6.6%
IXC

-

Basic Materials

YDEC
6.1%
IXC

-

Communication Services

YDEC
4.8%
IXC

-

Energy

YDEC
3.7%
IXC
100.0%

Utilities

YDEC
3.7%
IXC

-

Real Estate

YDEC
1.8%
IXC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YDEC vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YDEC
YDEC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
YDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
YDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
YDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
YDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YDEC vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YDECIXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.40

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

8.40

-0.43

YDEC vs. IXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the IXC Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YDEC and IXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YDEC vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YDEC drawdown since its inception was -23.34%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YDEC and IXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YDECIXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.34%

-67.88%

+44.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.89%

-13.31%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.95%

-19.06%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.34%

-24.93%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-11.99%

+11.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-17.46%

+13.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

3.80%

-2.49%

Volatility

YDEC vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) is 2.28%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that YDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YDECIXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

6.54%

-4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

15.76%

-9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.87%

19.16%

-12.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.24%

23.48%

-12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.98%

26.83%

-15.85%

YDEC vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

YDEC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

YDEC vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

YDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
3.11%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
YDEC
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YDEC and IXC have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXC has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to YDEC (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YDEC dropped -23.34% vs IXC's -67.88%.

On 5-year performance, IXC leads with 17.77% vs 4.88% for YDEC. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, YDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IXC has performed better with a 17.77% return vs 4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YDEC.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.00% for YDEC.

YDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IXC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YDEC and 0.40% for IXC.

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YDEC and IXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer