YCST.NEO vs. PLTE.TO
YCST.NEO (Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and PLTE.TO (Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YCST.NEO returned -7.85% vs 10.84% for PLTE.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
YCST.NEO vs. PLTE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YCST.NEO achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than PLTE.TO's -21.07% return.
YCST.NEO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- -7.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTE.TO
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -21.07%
- 6M
- -20.59%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCST.NEO vs. PLTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 12.72% | -16.43% |
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | -21.07% | 65.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between YCST.NEO and PLTE.TO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YCST.NEO vs. PLTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
YCST.NEO
PLTE.TO
YCST.NEO vs. PLTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) and Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YCST.NEO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.08 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 0.26 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 0.50 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YCST.NEO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 | 0.19 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | 0.99 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
YCST.NEO vs. PLTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YCST.NEO drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum PLTE.TO drawdown of -43.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCST.NEO and PLTE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YCST.NEO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.70% | -43.92% | +24.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | -41.32% | +21.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.62% | -31.82% | +19.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -17.25% | +8.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.91% | 21.78% | -11.87% |
Volatility
YCST.NEO vs. PLTE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) is 10.33%, while Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) has a volatility of 18.90%. This indicates that YCST.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YCST.NEO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.33% | 18.90% | -8.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | 42.12% | -25.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.54% | 56.11% | -35.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 69.55% | -44.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 69.55% | -44.33% |
YCST.NEO vs. PLTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both YCST.NEO and PLTE.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
YCST.NEO vs. PLTE.TO - Dividend Comparison
YCST.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.01%, less than PLTE.TO's 40.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 40.53% | 23.70% |
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 14.01% | 10.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YCST.NEO and PLTE.TO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YCST.NEO and PLTE.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for YCST.NEO and PLTE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer