YCST.NEO vs. KILO-B.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO).
YCST.NEO and KILO-B.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. YCST.NEO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Feb 20, 2025. KILO-B.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 15, 2018.
Performance
YCST.NEO vs. KILO-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
YCST.NEO vs. KILO-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 14.50% | -23.79% |
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 9.69% | 41.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YCST.NEO achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly higher than KILO-B.TO's 9.69% return.
YCST.NEO
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 14.50%
- 6M
- 4.79%
- 1Y
- -3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KILO-B.TO
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 44.84%
- 3Y*
- 34.07%
- 5Y*
- 24.42%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
YCST.NEO vs. KILO-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
YCST.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than KILO-B.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
YCST.NEO vs. KILO-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
YCST.NEO
KILO-B.TO
YCST.NEO vs. KILO-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YCST.NEO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | 1.73 | -1.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | 2.19 | -2.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.33 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.60 | -2.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 9.05 | -9.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YCST.NEO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 1.73 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | 1.29 | -1.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between YCST.NEO and KILO-B.TO is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
YCST.NEO vs. KILO-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither YCST.NEO nor KILO-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% |
Drawdowns
YCST.NEO vs. KILO-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YCST.NEO drawdown since its inception was -25.53%, which is greater than KILO-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCST.NEO and KILO-B.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YCST.NEO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.53% | -22.54% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.19% | -17.41% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.93% | -10.97% | -2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.34% | -7.59% | -5.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.02% | 5.01% | +8.01% |
Volatility
YCST.NEO vs. KILO-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) is 5.46%, while Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) has a volatility of 10.39%. This indicates that YCST.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KILO-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YCST.NEO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 10.39% | -4.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.25% | 23.08% | -7.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.81% | 26.08% | -4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 16.62% | +7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 17.99% | +5.84% |