PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBTC vs. RDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YBTC vs. RDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -26.04% return, which is significantly lower than RDTE's 10.92% return.


YBTC

1D
5.52%
1M
-20.34%
YTD
-26.04%
6M
-27.27%
1Y
-36.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RDTE

1D
0.90%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
10.92%
6M
9.96%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBTC vs. RDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and RDTE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YBTC vs. RDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBTC
YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

RDTE
RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBTC vs. RDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YBTCRDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.24

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

2.66

-3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

9.20

-10.61

YBTC vs. RDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the RDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBTC and RDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YBTCRDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

1.43

-2.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.90

-0.78

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. RDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -48.82%, which is greater than RDTE's maximum drawdown of -24.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and RDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YBTCRDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.82%

-24.32%

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.82%

-9.17%

-39.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.99%

-2.65%

-43.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.06%

-4.65%

-8.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.19%

2.65%

+23.54%

Volatility

YBTC vs. RDTE - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a higher volatility of 11.99% compared to Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) at 5.84%. This indicates that YBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YBTCRDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.99%

5.84%

+6.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.26%

12.85%

+19.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.93%

17.09%

+22.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.09%

19.32%

+21.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.09%

19.32%

+21.77%

YBTC vs. RDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both YBTC and RDTE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

YBTC vs. RDTE - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.91%, more than RDTE's 46.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
RDTE
Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
46.18%50.16%10.70%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
88.91%76.04%44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


YBTC and RDTE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YBTC has higher volatility (11.99%) compared to RDTE (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -48.82% vs RDTE's -24.32%.

On 1-year performance, RDTE leads with 24.27% vs -36.91% for YBTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, RDTE has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RDTE has performed better with a 24.27% return vs -36.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YBTC and RDTE have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.91%, compared with 46.18% for RDTE.

YBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RDTE is Derivative Income.

RDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBTC and RDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer