YBTC vs. RDTE
YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) and RDTE (Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Roundhill, while RDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YBTC returned -36.91% vs 24.27% for RDTE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
YBTC vs. RDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -26.04% return, which is significantly lower than RDTE's 10.92% return.
YBTC
- 1D
- 5.52%
- 1M
- -20.34%
- YTD
- -26.04%
- 6M
- -27.27%
- 1Y
- -36.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDTE
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBTC vs. RDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -26.04% | -4.23% | 37.94% |
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 10.92% | 9.46% | 8.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBTC and RDTE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBTC vs. RDTE — Risk / Return Rank
YBTC
RDTE
YBTC vs. RDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YBTC | RDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.24 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 2.66 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 9.20 | -10.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBTC | RDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 | 1.43 | -2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.90 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
YBTC vs. RDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -48.82%, which is greater than RDTE's maximum drawdown of -24.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and RDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBTC | RDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.82% | -24.32% | -24.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.82% | -9.17% | -39.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.99% | -2.65% | -43.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.06% | -4.65% | -8.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.19% | 2.65% | +23.54% |
Volatility
YBTC vs. RDTE - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a higher volatility of 11.99% compared to Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) at 5.84%. This indicates that YBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBTC | RDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.99% | 5.84% | +6.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.26% | 12.85% | +19.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.93% | 17.09% | +22.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.09% | 19.32% | +21.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.09% | 19.32% | +21.77% |
YBTC vs. RDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both YBTC and RDTE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
YBTC vs. RDTE - Dividend Comparison
YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.91%, more than RDTE's 46.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 46.18% | 50.16% | 10.70% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 88.91% | 76.04% | 44.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBTC and RDTE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YBTC has higher volatility (11.99%) compared to RDTE (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -48.82% vs RDTE's -24.32%.
On 1-year performance, RDTE leads with 24.27% vs -36.91% for YBTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, RDTE has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RDTE has performed better with a 24.27% return vs -36.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YBTC and RDTE have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.91%, compared with 46.18% for RDTE.
YBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RDTE is Derivative Income.
RDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YBTC and RDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer