YBTC vs. BCCC
YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) and BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. YBTC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCCC.
Performance
YBTC vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -23.39% return, which is significantly lower than BCCC's -21.49% return.
YBTC
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -16.32%
- YTD
- -23.39%
- 6M
- -26.70%
- 1Y
- -35.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCCC
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- -14.90%
- YTD
- -21.49%
- 6M
- -22.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBTC vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -23.39% | -15.21% |
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -21.49% | -7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBTC and BCCC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBTC vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank
YBTC
BCCC
YBTC vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YBTC | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBTC | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.78 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
YBTC vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and BCCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBTC | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.09% | -41.62% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.06% | -37.25% | -6.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.89% | -16.84% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.69% | — | — |
Volatility
YBTC vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBTC | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.20% | 35.07% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.81% | 35.07% | +5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.81% | 35.07% | +5.74% |
YBTC vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBTC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBTC vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison
YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.13%, more than BCCC's 62.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 62.51% | 29.55% | 0.00% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 88.13% | 76.04% | 44.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, YBTC and BCCC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BCCC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCCC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YBTC.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.13%, compared with 62.51% for BCCC.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YBTC and 0.75% for BCCC.
Find the right allocation for YBTC and BCCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer