YBST vs. XRMI
YBST (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Single Stock Universe ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. YBST is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. YBST charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.
Performance
YBST vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBST achieves a -21.33% return, which is significantly lower than XRMI's 3.64% return.
YBST
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- 6M
- -18.11%
- YTD
- -21.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XRMI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $126.16K | $125.56K | $168.31K | |
| $30.31K | $28.89K | $31.83K |
YBST vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YBST GraniteShares YieldBOOST Single Stock Universe ETF | -21.33% | -4.74% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 3.64% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBST and XRMI is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.60 |
YBST vs. XRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YBST
XRMI
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
YBST
XRMI
Healthcare
YBST
XRMI
Industrials
YBST
XRMI
Basic Materials
YBST
-
XRMI
Communication Services
YBST
-
XRMI
Consumer Cyclical
YBST
-
XRMI
Consumer Defensive
YBST
-
XRMI
Energy
YBST
-
XRMI
Real Estate
YBST
-
XRMI
Technology
YBST
-
XRMI
Utilities
YBST
-
XRMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBST vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank
YBST
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XRMI
YBST vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Single Stock Universe ETF (YBST) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YBST | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YBST vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBST drawdown since its inception was -26.61%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBST and XRMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBST | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.61% | -15.31% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.02% | -0.23% | -25.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.40% | -5.75% | -11.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.25% | — |
Volatility
YBST vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBST | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 5.68% | +10.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 6.87% | +9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 6.87% | +9.33% |
YBST vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBST has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBST vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison
YBST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.44%, more than XRMI's 12.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.52% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
YBST GraniteShares YieldBOOST Single Stock Universe ETF | 55.44% | 3.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBST and XRMI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for YBST.
YBST has the higher dividend yield at 55.44%, compared with 12.52% for XRMI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for YBST and 0.60% for XRMI.
Find the right allocation for YBST and XRMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer