YBMN vs. XMAG
YBMN (Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YBMN is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance, while XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. YBMN is actively managed, while XMAG is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YBMN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.
Performance
YBMN vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBMN achieves a -27.39% return, which is significantly lower than XMAG's 12.73% return.
YBMN
- 1D
- -5.25%
- 1M
- -21.70%
- YTD
- -27.39%
- 6M
- -38.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMAG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 24.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBMN vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YBMN Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF | -27.39% | -2.52% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 12.73% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBMN and XMAG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBMN vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank
YBMN
XMAG
YBMN vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF (YBMN) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBMN | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | 1.11 | -1.73 |
Drawdowns
YBMN vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBMN drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBMN and XMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBMN | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -16.17% | -34.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.98% | 0.00% | -46.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -2.13% | -28.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.63% | — |
Volatility
YBMN vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBMN | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.34% | 11.10% | +69.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.34% | 15.12% | +65.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.34% | 15.12% | +65.22% |
YBMN vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBMN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBMN vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison
YBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.07%, more than XMAG's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.24% |
YBMN Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF | 46.07% | 6.80% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBMN and XMAG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for YBMN.
YBMN has the higher dividend yield at 46.07%, compared with 0.46% for XMAG.
YBMN is categorized as Derivative Income, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for YBMN and 0.35% for XMAG.
Find the right allocation for YBMN and XMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer