PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBMN vs. LQTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YBMN vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF (YBMN) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBMN achieves a -23.25% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.63% return.


YBMN

1D
5.71%
1M
-18.29%
YTD
-23.25%
6M
-39.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LQTI

1D
0.47%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.68%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBMN vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YBMN and LQTI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YBMN vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBMN

LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBMN vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF (YBMN) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YBMN vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YBMNLQTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

0.94

-1.48

Drawdowns

YBMN vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBMN drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBMN and LQTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YBMNLQTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-3.41%

-47.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.95%

-0.97%

-42.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.06%

-0.88%

-30.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

Volatility

YBMN vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YBMNLQTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.44%

5.12%

+75.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.44%

5.97%

+74.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.44%

5.97%

+74.47%

YBMN vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBMN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

YBMN vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

YBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.58%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


YBMN and LQTI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for YBMN.

YBMN has the higher dividend yield at 43.58%, compared with 9.07% for LQTI.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for YBMN and 0.65% for LQTI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBMN and LQTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer