YBIT vs. BCCC
YBIT (YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF) and BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. YBIT charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCCC.
Performance
YBIT vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBIT achieves a -24.59% return, which is significantly lower than BCCC's -21.49% return.
YBIT
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -15.67%
- YTD
- -24.59%
- 6M
- -27.08%
- 1Y
- -35.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCCC
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- -14.90%
- YTD
- -21.49%
- 6M
- -22.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBIT vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.59% | -13.35% |
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -21.49% | -7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBIT and BCCC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBIT vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank
YBIT
BCCC
YBIT vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YBIT | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBIT | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | -0.78 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
YBIT vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBIT drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBIT and BCCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBIT | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.54% | -41.62% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.10% | -37.25% | -5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -16.84% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.69% | — | — |
Volatility
YBIT vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBIT | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.10% | 35.07% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 35.07% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 35.07% | +3.56% |
YBIT vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBIT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBIT vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison
YBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.02%, more than BCCC's 62.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 62.51% | 29.55% | 0.00% |
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | 101.02% | 88.33% | 60.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, YBIT and BCCC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BCCC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCCC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YBIT.
YBIT has the higher dividend yield at 101.02%, compared with 62.51% for BCCC.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for YBIT and 0.75% for BCCC.
Find the right allocation for YBIT and BCCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer