PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YANG vs. CN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YANG vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


YANG

1D
3.41%
1M
-4.71%
6M
42.31%
YTD
29.74%
1Y
16.00%
3Y*
-44.24%
5Y*
-33.99%
10Y*
-36.97%

CN

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YANG vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YANG
Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares
29.74%-62.77%-71.41%11.95%-41.34%25.90%-58.66%-40.72%13.14%-64.93%
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.10%-11.87%-23.85%-12.74%31.55%26.79%-22.41%43.69%

Correlation

The correlation between YANG and CN is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2014

-0.77

The correlation between YANG and CN shifts across timeframes, from -0.79 (10 years) to -0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YANG vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YANG
YANG Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
YANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
YANG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
YANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
YANG Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YANG vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YANGCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.88

YANG vs. CN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YANG vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YANGCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.17%

Volatility

YANG vs. CN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YANGCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.86%

YANG vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

YANG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

YANG vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%
YANG
Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares
2.84%4.03%9.42%3.66%0.00%0.00%0.67%1.54%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YANG and CN have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YANG.

YANG has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

YANG tracks FTSE China 50 Index (-300%), while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for YANG and 0.50% for CN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YANG and CN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer