YALL vs. FLAU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

YALL (God Bless America ETF) and FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YALL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal ETFs, while FLAU is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. YALL is actively managed, while FLAU is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, YALL returned 19.86%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for FLAU. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YALL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLAU.

Performance

YALL vs. FLAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in God Bless America ETF (YALL) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YALL achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than FLAU's 11.38% return.

YALL

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -3.63%
• YTD: -0.86%
• 6M: -1.72%
• 1Y: 6.38%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLAU

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 11.38%
• 6M: 12.15%
• 1Y: 16.49%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: 6.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YALL vs. FLAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
YALL God Bless America ETF	-0.86%	14.36%	29.99%	40.74%	8.04%
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	11.38%	15.95%	1.81%	12.58%	13.76%

Correlation

The correlation between YALL and FLAU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2022	0.66

The correlation between YALL and FLAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

YALL vs. FLAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YALL	FLAU
Technology	23.1%	1.8%
Financial Services	13.3%	37.1%
Industrials	13.0%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	9.8%	3.7%
Healthcare	9.6%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	6.6%
Communication Services	7.3%	1.9%
Basic Materials	5.2%	26.6%
Energy	4.7%	4.8%
Utilities	2.9%	1.6%
Real Estate	2.3%	6.0%

Return for Risk

YALL vs. FLAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YALL

YALL Risk / Return Rank: 16
YALL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
YALL Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
YALL Omega Ratio Rank: 14
YALL Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
YALL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FLAU

FLAU Risk / Return Rank: 30
FLAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FLAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FLAU Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FLAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FLAU Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YALL vs. FLAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for God Bless America ETF (YALL) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YALL	FLAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	0.88	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	1.30	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.16	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	1.50	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.56	4.50	-2.94

YALL vs. FLAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YALL Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the FLAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YALL and FLAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YALL vs. FLAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YALL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum FLAU drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YALL and FLAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	YALL	FLAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-45.73%	+26.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.42%	-10.01%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	-22.03%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.30%	-2.31%	-2.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.95%	-6.78%	+3.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	3.34%	+0.02%

Volatility

YALL vs. FLAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for God Bless America ETF (YALL) is 4.31%, while Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that YALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YALL	FLAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	5.83%	-1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.13%	14.31%	-4.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.75%	17.15%	-3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	19.68%	-2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	23.59%	-6.11%

YALL vs. FLAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

YALL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLAU's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

YALL vs. FLAU - Dividend Comparison

YALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than FLAU's 2.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	2.92%	3.25%	3.37%	3.62%	5.91%	5.14%	2.18%	4.37%	4.34%	0.18%
YALL God Bless America ETF	0.50%	0.49%	0.50%	3.51%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YALL and FLAU in my portfolio?

YALL and FLAU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YALL or FLAU?

FLAU has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to YALL (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YALL dropped -19.72% vs FLAU's -45.73%.

Which ETF is better, YALL or FLAU?

On 3-year performance, YALL leads with 19.86% vs 12.52% for FLAU. On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, YALL has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YALL or FLAU?

Over the 3-year period, YALL has performed better with a 19.86% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YALL or FLAU?

FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for YALL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YALL or FLAU?

FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 0.50% for YALL.

What is the main difference between YALL and FLAU?

YALL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLAU is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tidal ETFs and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for YALL and 0.09% for FLAU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.