YALL vs. ACVF
YALL (God Bless America ETF) and ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, YALL returned 19.02%/yr vs 18.70%/yr for ACVF. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. YALL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACVF.
Performance
YALL vs. ACVF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YALL achieves a -2.54% return, which is significantly lower than ACVF's 9.73% return.
YALL
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- YTD
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -4.13%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACVF
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 19.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- —
YALL vs. ACVF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YALL God Bless America ETF | -2.54% | 14.36% | 29.99% | 40.74% | 8.04% |
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 9.73% | 13.67% | 20.56% | 23.81% | 9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between YALL and ACVF is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between YALL and ACVF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
YALL vs. ACVF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YALL
ACVF
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
YALL
ACVF
Financial Services
YALL
ACVF
Industrials
YALL
ACVF
Consumer Defensive
YALL
ACVF
Healthcare
YALL
ACVF
Consumer Cyclical
YALL
ACVF
Communication Services
YALL
ACVF
Basic Materials
YALL
ACVF
Energy
YALL
ACVF
Utilities
YALL
ACVF
Real Estate
YALL
ACVF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YALL vs. ACVF — Risk / Return Rank
YALL
ACVF
YALL vs. ACVF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for God Bless America ETF (YALL) and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YALL | ACVF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.29 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 2.57 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | 10.13 | -8.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YALL vs. ACVF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YALL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum ACVF drawdown of -24.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YALL and ACVF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YALL | ACVF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -24.39% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -7.70% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.72% | -16.82% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -1.30% | -5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.97% | -4.72% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 1.95% | +1.51% |
Volatility
YALL vs. ACVF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for God Bless America ETF (YALL) is 3.91%, while American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that YALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACVF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YALL | ACVF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 4.74% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 9.83% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 12.05% | +1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 16.34% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 16.00% | +1.47% |
YALL vs. ACVF - Expense Ratio Comparison
YALL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ACVF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
YALL vs. ACVF - Dividend Comparison
YALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than ACVF's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 0.54% | 0.59% | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.61% | 0.23% |
YALL God Bless America ETF | 0.51% | 0.49% | 0.50% | 3.51% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YALL and ACVF have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACVF has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to YALL (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YALL dropped -19.72% vs ACVF's -24.39%.
On 3-year performance, YALL leads with 19.02% vs 18.70% for ACVF. On fees, YALL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, YALL has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, YALL has performed better with a 19.02% return vs 18.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YALL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.
ACVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.51% for YALL.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal ETFs and Ridgeline Research LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for YALL and 0.75% for ACVF.
ACVF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YALL and ACVF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer